Simkin Penny, Bolding April
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2004 Nov-Dec;49(6):489-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2004.07.007.
The control of labor pain and prevention of suffering are major concerns of clinicians and their clients. Nonpharmacologic approaches toward these goals are consistent with midwifery management and the choices of many women. We undertook a literature search of scientific articles cataloged in CINAHL, PUBMED, the Cochrane Library, and AMED databases relating to the effectiveness of 13 non-pharmacologic methods used to relieve pain and reduce suffering in labor. Suffering, which is different from pain, is not an outcome that is usually measured after childbirth. We assumed that suffering is unlikely if indicators of satisfaction were positive after childbirth. Adequate evidence of benefit in reducing pain exists for continuous labor support, baths, intradermal water blocks, and maternal movement and positioning. Acupuncture, massage, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and hypnosis are promising, but they require further study. The effectiveness of childbirth education, relaxation and breathing, heat and cold, acupressure, hypnosis, aromatherapy, music, and audioanalgesia are either inadequately studied or findings are too variable to draw conclusions on effectiveness. All the methods studied had evidence of widespread satisfaction among a majority of users.
产痛控制和痛苦预防是临床医生及其患者主要关注的问题。实现这些目标的非药物方法与助产管理以及许多女性的选择相一致。我们对CINAHL、PUBMED、Cochrane图书馆和AMED数据库中编目的科学文章进行了文献检索,这些文章涉及13种用于缓解分娩疼痛和减轻痛苦的非药物方法的有效性。痛苦不同于疼痛,它不是产后通常测量的结果。我们假设,如果产后满意度指标为阳性,则不太可能出现痛苦。对于持续的分娩支持、沐浴、皮内水阻滞以及产妇的活动和体位,有充分的证据表明其在减轻疼痛方面有益。针灸、按摩、经皮电刺激神经疗法和催眠疗法很有前景,但需要进一步研究。分娩教育、放松与呼吸、热疗与冷疗、指压疗法、催眠疗法、芳香疗法、音乐和音频镇痛的有效性要么研究不足,要么结果差异太大,无法就其有效性得出结论。所有研究的方法都有证据表明大多数使用者普遍满意。