Norman Paul E, Jamrozik Konrad, Lawrence-Brown Michael M, Le Max T Q, Spencer Carole A, Tuohy Raywin J, Parsons Richard W, Dickinson James A
School of Surgery and Pathology, University of Western Australia, Fremantle Hospital, PO Box 480, Fremantle, WA 6959, Australia.
BMJ. 2004 Nov 27;329(7477):1259. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38272.478438.55. Epub 2004 Nov 15.
To assess whether screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms in men reduces mortality.
Population based randomised controlled trial of ultrasound screening, with intention to treat analysis of age standardised mortality.
Community based screening programme in Western Australia.
41,000 men aged 65-83 years randomised to intervention and control groups.
Invitation to ultrasound screening.
Deaths from abdominal aortic aneurysm in the five years after the start of screening.
The corrected response to invitation to screening was 70%. The crude prevalence was 7.2% for aortic diameter > or = 30 mm and 0.5% for diameter > or = 55 mm. Twice as many men in the intervention group than in the control group underwent elective surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm (107 v 54, P = 0.002, chi2 test). Between scheduled screening and the end of follow up 18 men in the intervention group and 25 in the control group died from abdominal aortic aneurysm, yielding a mortality ratio of 0.61 (95% confidence interval 0.33 to 1.11). Any benefit was almost entirely in men aged between 65 and 75 years, where the ratio was reduced to 0.19 (0.04 to 0.89).
At a whole population level screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms was not effective in men aged 65-83 years and did not reduce overall death rates. The success of screening depends on choice of target age group and the exclusion of ineligible men. It is also important to assess the current rate of elective surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm as in some communities this may already approach a level that reduces the potential benefit of population based screening.
评估对男性进行腹主动脉瘤筛查是否可降低死亡率。
基于人群的超声筛查随机对照试验,采用意向性分析年龄标准化死亡率。
西澳大利亚州的社区筛查项目。
41000名年龄在65 - 83岁的男性,随机分为干预组和对照组。
邀请进行超声筛查。
筛查开始后五年内腹主动脉瘤导致的死亡。
对筛查邀请的校正应答率为70%。主动脉直径≥30mm的粗患病率为7.2%,直径≥55mm的为0.5%。干预组接受腹主动脉瘤择期手术的男性人数是对照组的两倍(107例对54例,P = 0.002,卡方检验)。在预定筛查至随访结束期间,干预组有18名男性、对照组有25名男性死于腹主动脉瘤,死亡率比为0.61(95%置信区间0.33至1.11)。任何益处几乎完全体现在年龄在65至75岁的男性中,该年龄段死亡率比降至0.19(0.04至0.89)。
在总体人群水平上,对65 - 83岁男性进行腹主动脉瘤筛查无效,未降低总体死亡率。筛查的成功取决于目标年龄组的选择以及排除不符合条件的男性。评估当前腹主动脉瘤择期手术率也很重要,因为在一些社区,这可能已接近可降低基于人群筛查潜在益处的水平。