Zwald N R, Weigel K A, Chang Y M, Welper R D, Clay J S
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Dairy Science, Madison, 53706, USA.
J Dairy Sci. 2004 Dec;87(12):4295-302. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73574-2.
The objectives of this study were to calculate genetic correlations between health traits that were recorded in on-farm herd management software programs and to assess relationships between these traits and other traits that are routinely evaluated in US dairy sires. Data consisted of 272,576 lactation incidence records for displaced abomasum (DA), ketosis (KET), mastitis (MAST), lameness (LAME), cystic ovaries (CYST), and metritis (MET) from 161,622 cows in 646 herds. These data were collected between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2003 in herds using the Dairy Comp 305, DHI-Plus, or PCDART herd management software programs. Binary incidence data for all disorders were analyzed simultaneously using a multiple-trait threshold sire model that included random sire and herd-year-season of calving effects. Although data from multiple lactations were available for some animals, our genetic analysis included only first parity records due to concerns about selection bias and improper modeling of the covariance structure. Heritability estimates for the presence or absence of each disorder during first lactation were 0.14 for DA, 0.06 for KET, 0.09 for MAST, 0.03 for LAME, 0.04 for CYST, and 0.06 for MET. Estimated genetic correlations were 0.45 between DA and KET, 0.42 between KET and CYST, 0.20 between MAST and LAME, 0.19 between KET and LAME, 0.17 between DA and CYST, 0.17 between KET and LAME, 0.17 between KET and MET, and 0.16 between LAME and CYST. All other correlations were negligible. Correlations between predicted transmitting abilities for the aforementioned health traits and existing production, type, and fitness traits were low, though it must be noted that these estimates may have been biased by low reliability of the health trait evaluations. Based on results of this study, it appears that genetic selection for health disorders recorded in on-farm software programs can be effective. These traits can be incorporated into selection indices directly, or they can be combined into composite traits, such as "reproductive disorders", "metabolic disorders", or "early lactation disorders".
本研究的目的是计算农场畜群管理软件程序中记录的健康性状之间的遗传相关性,并评估这些性状与美国奶牛种公牛常规评估的其他性状之间的关系。数据包括来自646个畜群中161,622头奶牛的272,576条关于皱胃移位(DA)、酮病(KET)、乳腺炎(MAST)、跛行(LAME)、卵巢囊肿(CYST)和子宫炎(MET)的泌乳发病率记录。这些数据于2001年1月1日至2003年12月31日期间在使用Dairy Comp 305、DHI-Plus或PCDART畜群管理软件程序的畜群中收集。使用包含随机父本以及产犊年份季节效应的多性状阈值父本模型对所有疾病的二元发病率数据进行了同时分析。尽管部分动物有多胎泌乳数据,但由于担心选择偏差和协方差结构建模不当,我们的遗传分析仅包括头胎记录。头胎期间每种疾病发生与否的遗传力估计值分别为:DA为0.14,KET为0.06,MAST为0.09,LAME为0.03,CYST为0.04,MET为0.06。估计的遗传相关性为:DA与KET之间为0.45,KET与CYST之间为0.42,MAST与LAME之间为0.20,KET与LAME之间为0.19,DA与CYST之间为0.17,KET与LAME之间为0.17,KET与MET之间为0.17,LAME与CYST之间为0.16。所有其他相关性均可忽略不计。上述健康性状的预测传递能力与现有生产、体型和健康性状之间的相关性较低,不过必须指出,这些估计值可能因健康性状评估的低可靠性而存在偏差。基于本研究结果,似乎对农场软件程序中记录的健康疾病进行遗传选择可能是有效的。这些性状可直接纳入选择指数,或者可将它们组合成复合性状,如“繁殖疾病”、“代谢疾病”或“早期泌乳疾病”。