Suppr超能文献

野生一年生向日葵(向日葵和叶柄向日葵)物种差异的遗传学

Genetics of species differences in the wild annual sunflowers, Helianthus annuus and H. petiolaris.

作者信息

Lexer Christian, Rosenthal David M, Raymond Olivier, Donovan Lisa A, Rieseberg Loren H

机构信息

Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, UK.

出版信息

Genetics. 2005 Apr;169(4):2225-39. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.031195. Epub 2004 Nov 15.

Abstract

Much of our knowledge of speciation genetics stems from quantitative trait locus (QTL) studies. However, interpretations of the size and distribution of QTL underlying species differences are complicated by differences in the way QTL magnitudes are estimated. Also, many studies fail to exploit information about QTL directions or to compare inter- and intraspecific QTL variation. Here, we comprehensively analyze an extensive QTL data set for an interspecific backcross between two wild annual sunflowers, Helianthus annuus and H. petiolaris, interpret different estimates of QTL magnitudes, identify trait groups that have diverged through selection, and compare inter- and intraspecific QTL magnitudes. Our results indicate that even minor QTL (in terms of backcross variance) may be surprisingly large compared to levels of standing variation in the parental species or phenotypic differences between them. Morphological traits, particularly flower morphology, were more strongly or consistently selected than life history or physiological traits. Also, intraspecific QTL were generally smaller than interspecific ones, consistent with the prediction that larger QTL are more likely to spread to fixation across a subdivided population. Our results inform the genetics of species differences in Helianthus and suggest an approach for the simultaneous mapping of inter- and intraspecific QTL.

摘要

我们对物种形成遗传学的许多认识都源于数量性状基因座(QTL)研究。然而,由于估计QTL大小的方式不同,对构成物种差异的QTL的大小和分布的解释变得复杂。此外,许多研究未能利用有关QTL方向的信息,也未能比较种间和种内QTL的变异。在这里,我们全面分析了两个野生一年生向日葵(向日葵和叶柄向日葵)种间回交的大量QTL数据集,解释了QTL大小的不同估计值,识别了通过选择而分化的性状组,并比较了种间和种内QTL的大小。我们的结果表明,即使是微小的QTL(就回交方差而言)与亲本物种的现存变异水平或它们之间的表型差异相比,可能也出奇地大。形态性状,特别是花的形态,比生活史或生理性状受到更强或更一致的选择。此外,种内QTL通常比种间QTL小,这与较大的QTL更有可能在一个细分种群中扩散到固定状态的预测一致。我们的结果为向日葵物种差异的遗传学提供了信息,并提出了一种同时绘制种间和种内QTL的方法。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS.分析统计检验表
Evolution. 1989 Jan;43(1):223-225. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04220.x.
6
The genetics of adaptation: a reassessment.适应的遗传学:重新评估
Am Nat. 1992 Nov;140(5):725-42. doi: 10.1086/285437.
7
Integration of populations and differentiation of species.种群整合与物种分化。
New Phytol. 2004 Jan;161(1):59-69. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00933.x.
8
Evolution in Mendelian Populations.孟德尔群体中的进化。
Genetics. 1931 Mar;16(2):97-159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/16.2.97.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验