Suppr超能文献

[多普勒超声检查在诊断颈动脉狭窄中的意义]

[Significance of Doppler ultrasound procedures for diagnosis of carotid stenoses].

作者信息

Kubale R, Arning C

机构信息

Institut für Radiologie, Sonographie und Nuklearmedizin, Pirmasens.

出版信息

Radiologe. 2004 Oct;44(10):946-59. doi: 10.1007/s00117-004-1118-5.

Abstract

Determining degree and morphology of stenoses is important for surgical planning or stent implantation. Vascular ultrasound is usually the first modality to evaluate carotid artery stenosis. Due to rapid development various methods of vascular ultrasound are applied including continuous wave (CW) Doppler, duplex Doppler, colour-coded duplex sonography (CCDS), power Doppler and B-flow technique. For quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis the most frequently used parameters are peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV) in the internal carotid artery (ICA), as well as ICA to CCA ratios of PSV and EDV. Different results reported in the literature may reflect differences in defining the degree of stenosis and methodological differences in protocol or imaging techniques. Differences in defining the degree of stenosis, advantages and disadvantages of the different Doppler techniques and future developments are discussed in detail.

摘要

确定狭窄的程度和形态对于手术规划或支架植入很重要。血管超声通常是评估颈动脉狭窄的首选方式。由于快速发展,各种血管超声方法都被应用,包括连续波(CW)多普勒、双功多普勒、彩色编码双功超声(CCDS)、功率多普勒和B-flow技术。对于狭窄程度的定量评估,最常用的参数是颈内动脉(ICA)的收缩期峰值速度(PSV)、舒张末期速度(EDV),以及PSV和EDV的ICA与颈总动脉(CCA)比值。文献中报道的不同结果可能反映了在定义狭窄程度方面的差异以及方案或成像技术的方法学差异。本文将详细讨论在定义狭窄程度方面的差异、不同多普勒技术的优缺点以及未来发展。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验