Kubale R, Arning C
Institut für Radiologie, Sonographie und Nuklearmedizin, Pirmasens.
Radiologe. 2004 Oct;44(10):946-59. doi: 10.1007/s00117-004-1118-5.
Determining degree and morphology of stenoses is important for surgical planning or stent implantation. Vascular ultrasound is usually the first modality to evaluate carotid artery stenosis. Due to rapid development various methods of vascular ultrasound are applied including continuous wave (CW) Doppler, duplex Doppler, colour-coded duplex sonography (CCDS), power Doppler and B-flow technique. For quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis the most frequently used parameters are peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV) in the internal carotid artery (ICA), as well as ICA to CCA ratios of PSV and EDV. Different results reported in the literature may reflect differences in defining the degree of stenosis and methodological differences in protocol or imaging techniques. Differences in defining the degree of stenosis, advantages and disadvantages of the different Doppler techniques and future developments are discussed in detail.
确定狭窄的程度和形态对于手术规划或支架植入很重要。血管超声通常是评估颈动脉狭窄的首选方式。由于快速发展,各种血管超声方法都被应用,包括连续波(CW)多普勒、双功多普勒、彩色编码双功超声(CCDS)、功率多普勒和B-flow技术。对于狭窄程度的定量评估,最常用的参数是颈内动脉(ICA)的收缩期峰值速度(PSV)、舒张末期速度(EDV),以及PSV和EDV的ICA与颈总动脉(CCA)比值。文献中报道的不同结果可能反映了在定义狭窄程度方面的差异以及方案或成像技术的方法学差异。本文将详细讨论在定义狭窄程度方面的差异、不同多普勒技术的优缺点以及未来发展。