Hematti Peiman, Hong Bum-Kee, Ferguson Cole, Adler Rima, Hanawa Hideki, Sellers Stephanie, Holt Ingeborg E, Eckfeldt Craig E, Sharma Yugal, Schmidt Manfred, von Kalle Christof, Persons Derek A, Billings Eric M, Verfaillie Catherine M, Nienhuis Arthur W, Wolfsberg Tyra G, Dunbar Cynthia E, Calmels Boris
Hematology Branch, National Institutes of Health Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
PLoS Biol. 2004 Dec;2(12):e423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020423. Epub 2004 Nov 23.
Murine leukemia virus (MLV)-derived vectors are widely used for hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) gene transfer, but lentiviral vectors such as the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) may allow higher efficiency transfer and better expression. Recent studies in cell lines have challenged the notion that retroviruses and retroviral vectors integrate randomly into their host genome. Medical applications using these vectors are aimed at HSCs, and thus large-scale comprehensive analysis of MLV and SIV integration in long-term repopulating HSCs is crucial to help develop improved integrating vectors. We studied integration sites in HSCs of rhesus monkeys that had been transplanted 6 mo to 6 y prior with MLV- or SIV-transduced CD34(+)cells. Unique MLV (491) and SIV (501) insertions were compared to a set of in silico-generated random integration sites. While MLV integrants were located predominantly around transcription start sites, SIV integrants strongly favored transcription units and gene-dense regions of the genome. These integration patterns suggest different mechanisms for integration as well as distinct safety implications for MLV versus SIV vectors.
鼠白血病病毒(MLV)衍生载体被广泛用于造血干细胞(HSC)基因转移,但慢病毒载体如猿猴免疫缺陷病毒(SIV)可能具有更高的转移效率和更好的表达效果。最近在细胞系中的研究对逆转录病毒和逆转录病毒载体随机整合到宿主基因组中的观点提出了挑战。使用这些载体的医学应用针对造血干细胞,因此对长期重建造血干细胞中MLV和SIV整合进行大规模综合分析对于开发改进的整合载体至关重要。我们研究了6个月至6年前用MLV或SIV转导的CD34(+)细胞进行移植的恒河猴造血干细胞中的整合位点。将独特的MLV(491个)和SIV(501个)插入与一组计算机生成的随机整合位点进行比较。虽然MLV整合子主要位于转录起始位点周围,但SIV整合子强烈倾向于基因组的转录单元和基因密集区域。这些整合模式表明了不同的整合机制以及MLV与SIV载体不同的安全隐患。