Dempster J H, Mackenzie K
Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1992 Feb;17(1):54-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1992.tb00988.x.
Clinical voice testing forms part of the routine assessment of children's hearing. However, its role in paediatric practice has not been defined. In particular, the sensitivity and specificity of the test in detecting the presence of a hearing impairment is not known. The value of the test as a screen was assessed by comparison of the results of free-field clinical voice testing with pure-tone audiometric thresholds in 141 children aged 5-12 years. In order to pass the screen, a child had to respond to a whispered voice 2 feet (60 cm) from the test ear. The mean pure-tone average (average at 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 kHz) of those ears that passed was 14 dB HL compared with 31 dB HL for those that failed (P less than 0.001). The test was 80% sensitive (95% specific) in detecting a hearing impairment greater than or equal to 25 dB HL, and 89% sensitive (90% specific) in detecting a hearing impairment greater than or equal to 30 dB HL. Therefore, clinical voice tests will fail to detect a significant proportion of children with a hearing impairment and cannot be advocated as a screening method. The test would appear to be of limited value in a specialist situation where facilities for pure-tone audiometry exist.
临床语音测试是儿童听力常规评估的一部分。然而,其在儿科实践中的作用尚未明确。特别是,该测试在检测听力障碍方面的敏感性和特异性尚不清楚。通过比较141名5至12岁儿童的自由场临床语音测试结果与纯音听力阈值,评估了该测试作为筛查工具的价值。为了通过筛查,儿童必须对距测试耳2英尺(60厘米)处的低语做出反应。通过测试的耳朵的平均纯音平均值(0.5、1.0和2.0千赫处的平均值)为14分贝听力级,而未通过测试的耳朵为31分贝听力级(P小于0.001)。该测试在检测大于或等于25分贝听力级的听力障碍时敏感性为80%(特异性为95%),在检测大于或等于30分贝听力级的听力障碍时敏感性为89%(特异性为90%)。因此,临床语音测试将无法检测出相当一部分有听力障碍的儿童,不能作为一种筛查方法提倡。在有纯音听力测试设备的专科情况下,该测试的价值似乎有限。