MRC Institute of Hearing Research (Scottish section), Glasgow, UK.
BMJ Open. 2013 Apr 18;3(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002394. Print 2013.
To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the whispered voice test (WVT) in detecting hearing loss when administered by practitioners with different levels of experience.
Diagnostic accuracy study of WVT, through acoustic analysis of whispers of experienced and inexperienced practitioners (experiment 1) and behavioural validation of these recordings (experiment 2).
Research institute with a pool of patients sourced from local clinics in the Greater Glasgow area.
22 people had their whispers recorded and analysed in experiment 1; 4 older experienced (OE), 4 older inexperienced (OI) and 14 younger inexperienced (YI). In experiment 2, 73 people (112 individual ears) took part in a digit recognition task using 2 OE and 2 YI whisperers from experiment 1.
Average level (dB sound pressure level) across frequency, average level across all utterances (dB A) and within/across-digit deviation (dB A) for experiment 1. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of WVT for experiment 2.
In experiment 1, OE whisperers were 8-10 dB more intense than inexperienced whisperers across all whispered utterances. Variability was low and comparable regardless of age or experience. In experiment 2, at an optimum threshold of 40 dB HL, sensitivity and specificity were 63% (95% CI of 58% to 68%) and 93% (92% to 94%), respectively, for OE whisperers. PPV was 56% (51% to 61%), NPV was 95% (94% to 96%). For YI whisperers at an optimum threshold of 29 dB HL, sensitivity and specificity were 80% (78% to 82%) and 52% (50% to 55%), respectively. PPV was 65% (63% to 67%) and NPV was 70% (67% to 72%).
WVT is an effective screening test, providing the level of the whisperer is considered when setting the test's hearing-loss criterion. Possible implications are voice measurement while training for inexperienced whisperers.
确定不同经验水平的从业者进行耳语测试(WVT)时检测听力损失的敏感性和特异性。
通过对经验丰富和缺乏经验的从业者的耳语进行声学分析(实验 1)和对这些记录进行行为验证(实验 2),对 WVT 进行诊断准确性研究。
研究机构,患者来自格拉斯哥地区的当地诊所。
22 人在实验 1 中记录和分析了他们的耳语;4 名老年有经验者(OE)、4 名老年无经验者(OI)和 14 名年轻无经验者(YI)。在实验 2 中,73 人(112 只耳朵)参与了一项数字识别任务,使用了实验 1 中的 2 名 OE 和 2 名 YI 耳语者。
实验 1 中平均水平(dB 声压级)、平均水平(dB A)和内/跨数字偏差(dB A)。实验 2 中 WVT 的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。
在实验 1 中,OE 耳语者在所有耳语中比缺乏经验的耳语者强 8-10 dB。无论年龄或经验如何,变异性均较低且相似。在实验 2 中,在最佳阈值为 40 dB HL 时,OE 耳语者的敏感性和特异性分别为 63%(95%CI 为 58%至 68%)和 93%(92%至 94%)。PPV 为 56%(51%至 61%),NPV 为 95%(94%至 96%)。在最佳阈值为 29 dB HL 时,YI 耳语者的敏感性和特异性分别为 80%(78%至 82%)和 52%(50%至 55%)。PPV 为 65%(63%至 67%),NPV 为 70%(67%至 72%)。
WVT 是一种有效的筛查测试,在设定测试的听力损失标准时,需要考虑耳语者的水平。这可能暗示在对缺乏经验的耳语者进行培训时进行语音测量。