Suppr超能文献

基于智能手机的听力计、自我感知、HHIE 筛查问卷和自由场语音测试筛查老年人听力障碍:与标准纯音听力计比较评估筛查准确性。

Screening for Hearing Impairment in Older Adults by Smartphone-Based Audiometry, Self-Perception, HHIE Screening Questionnaire, and Free-Field Voice Test: Comparative Evaluation of the Screening Accuracy With Standard Pure-Tone Audiometry.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Shin Kong Wu-Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Otolaryngology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct 27;8(10):e17213. doi: 10.2196/17213.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hearing impairment is the most frequent sensory deficit in humans, affecting more than 360 million people worldwide. In fact, hearing impairment is not merely a health problem, but it also has a great impact on the educational performance, economic income, and quality of life. Hearing impairment is therefore an important social concern.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracy of self-perception, Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) questionnaire, free-field voice test, and smartphone-based audiometry as tests for screening moderate hearing impairment in older adults in China.

METHODS

In this study, 41 patients were recruited through a single otology practice. All patients were older than 65 years. Patients with otorrhea and cognitive impairment were excluded. Moderate hearing impairment was defined as mean hearing thresholds at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz >40 dB hearing loss (pure-tone average > 40 dB hearing loss). All patients completed 5 hearing tests, namely, the self-perception test, HHIE-S questionnaire test, free-field voice test, smartphone-based audiometry test, and standard pure-tone audiometry by the same audiologist. We compared the results of these tests to the standard audiogram in the better-hearing ear.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and the specificity of the self-perception test were 0.58 (95% CI 0.29-0.84) and 0.34 (95% CI 0.19-0.54), respectively. The sensitivity and the specificity of the HHIE-S questionnaire test were 0.67 (95% CI 0.35-0.89) and 0.31 (95% CI 0.316-0.51), respectively. The sensitivity and the specificity of the free-field voice test were 0.83 (95% CI 0.51-0.97) and 0.41 (95% CI 0.24-0.61), respectively. The sensitivity and the specificity of the smartphone-based audiometry test were 0.92 (95% CI 0.60-0.99) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.56-0.89), respectively. Smartphone-based audiometry correctly diagnosed the presence of hearing loss with high sensitivity and high specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Smartphone-based audiometry may be a dependable screening test to rule out moderate hearing impairment in the older population.

摘要

背景

听力障碍是人类最常见的感觉缺陷,全球有超过 3.6 亿人受到影响。事实上,听力障碍不仅是一个健康问题,还会对教育表现、经济收入和生活质量产生重大影响。因此,听力障碍是一个重要的社会关注点。

目的

我们旨在评估和比较自我感知、老年人听力障碍问卷筛查版(HHIE-S)问卷、声场测试和基于智能手机的听力测试作为中国老年人中度听力障碍筛查测试的准确性。

方法

在这项研究中,通过单一耳科实践招募了 41 名患者。所有患者年龄均大于 65 岁。排除有耳漏和认知障碍的患者。中度听力障碍定义为 500、1000、2000 和 4000 Hz 的平均听力阈值>40 dB 听力损失(纯音平均听力损失>40 dB)。所有患者均由同一位听力学家完成 5 项听力测试,即自我感知测试、HHIE-S 问卷测试、声场测试、基于智能手机的听力测试和标准纯音听力测试。我们将这些测试的结果与较好耳的标准听力图进行比较。

结果

自我感知测试的灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.58(95%CI 0.29-0.84)和 0.34(95%CI 0.19-0.54)。HHIE-S 问卷测试的灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.67(95%CI 0.35-0.89)和 0.31(95%CI 0.316-0.51)。声场测试的灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.83(95%CI 0.51-0.97)和 0.41(95%CI 0.24-0.61)。基于智能手机的听力测试的灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.92(95%CI 0.60-0.99)和 0.76(95%CI 0.56-0.89)。基于智能手机的听力测试正确诊断听力损失的灵敏度和特异性均较高。

结论

基于智能手机的听力测试可能是一种可靠的筛查测试,可以排除老年人的中度听力障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d427/7655471/c2abda8ce146/mhealth_v8i10e17213_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验