• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用吸收功率法评估手动轮椅推进过程中所选座垫的减震效果。

Using the absorbed power method to evaluate effectiveness of vibration absorption of selected seat cushions during manual wheelchair propulsion.

作者信息

Wolf Erik J, Cooper M S Rory A, DiGiovine Carmen P, Boninger Michael L, Guo Songfeng

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Med Eng Phys. 2004 Nov;26(9):799-806. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.06.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.06.005
PMID:15564117
Abstract

Although wheelchair users are frequently subjected to oscillatory and shock vibrations, little research has been conducted to assess the whole-body vibration exposure of wheelchair users. The purpose of this study was to determine if selected wheelchair cushions alter potentially harmful whole-body vibrations transferred to wheelchair users. Thirty-two participants, who use wheelchairs as their primary mode of mobility, contributed to this study. Four of the most commonly prescribed wheelchair cushions were selected. Participants were asked to propel their wheelchair over a simulated activities of daily living (ADL) course while acceleration and force data were recorded. A repeated measures ANOVA showed no significant differences between the different cushions for the total averaged absorbed power (p = 0.190), the 50 mm curb drop (p = 0.234), or the rumble strip (p = 0.143). A repeated measure ANOVA for the peak curb drop absorbed power revealed a significant difference in the cushions (p = 0.043). The cushions that were most effective in this testing appear to be the Invacare Pindot and the Varilite Solo. Not only did those cushions appear to have the lowest values much of the time but also they did not display the highest values. When comparing results from a similar study, absorbed power appears to be as effective in determining vibration effects in the time domain as the methods in the ISO 2631 Standard.

摘要

尽管轮椅使用者经常受到振荡和冲击振动的影响,但很少有研究评估轮椅使用者的全身振动暴露情况。本研究的目的是确定所选的轮椅坐垫是否能改变传递给轮椅使用者的潜在有害全身振动。32名以轮椅为主要出行方式的参与者参与了本研究。挑选了四种最常用的轮椅坐垫。参与者被要求在模拟的日常生活活动(ADL)路线上推动轮椅,同时记录加速度和力的数据。重复测量方差分析表明,不同坐垫在总平均吸收功率(p = 0.190)、50毫米路缘落差(p = 0.234)或减速带(p = 0.143)方面没有显著差异。对路缘落差峰值吸收功率进行的重复测量方差分析显示,坐垫之间存在显著差异(p = 0.043)。在该测试中最有效的坐垫似乎是英维康Pindot和Varilite Solo。这些坐垫不仅在大部分时间里似乎具有最低的值,而且它们也没有显示出最高的值。在比较类似研究的结果时,吸收功率在确定时域振动效应方面似乎与ISO 2631标准中的方法一样有效。

相似文献

1
Using the absorbed power method to evaluate effectiveness of vibration absorption of selected seat cushions during manual wheelchair propulsion.采用吸收功率法评估手动轮椅推进过程中所选座垫的减震效果。
Med Eng Phys. 2004 Nov;26(9):799-806. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.06.005.
2
Whole-body vibration during manual wheelchair propulsion with selected seat cushions and back supports.
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2003 Sep;11(3):311-22. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2003.816872.
3
Analysis of whole-body vibration during manual wheelchair propulsion: a comparison of seat cushions and back supports for individuals without a disability.手动轮椅推进过程中的全身振动分析:针对非残疾个体的座垫和靠背支撑比较
Assist Technol. 2003 Winter;15(2):129-44. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2003.10131897.
4
Vibration exposure of individuals using wheelchairs over sidewalk surfaces.使用轮椅在人行道表面行驶的个人所面临的振动暴露。
Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Dec 15;27(23):1443-9. doi: 10.1080/09638280500264709.
5
Evaluation of a pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair.一款推圈激活式动力辅助轮椅的评估
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 May;82(5):702-8. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.20836.
6
User assessment of manual wheelchair ride comfort and ergonomics.用户对手动轮椅乘坐舒适性和人体工程学的评估。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Apr;81(4):490-4. doi: 10.1053/mr.2000.3845.
7
Pressure-reducing cushions: perceptions of comfort from the wheelchair users' perspective using interface pressure, temperature and humidity measurements.减压坐垫:从轮椅使用者角度出发,通过界面压力、温度和湿度测量对舒适度的认知。
J Tissue Viability. 2009 May;18(2):28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2007.09.006. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
8
Evaluation of selected sidewalk pavement surfaces for vibration experienced by users of manual and powered wheelchairs.对选定的人行道路面进行评估,以了解手动轮椅和电动轮椅使用者所感受到的振动情况。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2004;27(5):468-75. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2004.11752239.
9
Effect of seat cushion on dynamic stability in sitting during a reaching task in wheelchair users with paraplegia.坐垫对截瘫轮椅使用者在伸手够物任务中坐姿动态稳定性的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Feb;82(2):274-81. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.19473.
10
Analysis of vibrations induced during wheelchair propulsion.轮椅推进过程中诱发振动的分析。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001 Jul-Aug;38(4):409-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of Polyurethane Foam as a Material for Reducing Vibration of Wheelchair User.聚氨酯泡沫作为减少轮椅使用者振动材料的应用。
Materials (Basel). 2025 Mar 14;18(6):1280. doi: 10.3390/ma18061280.
2
Enhanced boxing punch impact with silicone cushioning.采用硅胶缓冲技术增强拳击冲击力。
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Aug 8;6:1358224. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1358224. eCollection 2024.
3
Investigating the Impact of Carbon Fiber as a Wheelchair Frame Material on Its Ability to Dissipate Kinetic Energy and Reduce Vibrations.
研究碳纤维作为轮椅框架材料对其动能耗散和减震能力的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2024 Jan 29;17(3):641. doi: 10.3390/ma17030641.
4
User Assessment of a Novel Suspension for a Wheelchair-A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind Trial.轮椅新型悬架的用户评估——一项前瞻性、随机、双盲试验
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2020 Dec 28;11:2151459320983268. doi: 10.1177/2151459320983268. eCollection 2020.
5
Health risks of vibration exposure to wheelchair users in the community.社区中轮椅使用者接触振动的健康风险。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2013 Jul;36(4):365-75. doi: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000124.