Thieme Kati, Turk Dennis C, Flor Herta
Department of Anesthesiology at the University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356540, Seattle, WA 98195-6540, USA.
Psychosom Med. 2004 Nov-Dec;66(6):837-44. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000146329.63158.40.
The prevalence as well as predictors of psychiatric disorders (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition [DSM-IV] axis I and II) in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) was evaluated.
One-hundred fifteen patients with FMS participated in the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV to assess current mental disorders. In addition, patients completed standardized questionnaires regarding pain, pain impact, anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder-like symptoms, and sexual and physical abuse.
Patients were grouped into one of three psychosocial subgroups based on responses to the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI)-Dysfunctional (DYS), Interpersonally Distressed (ID), and Adaptive Copers (AC). Axis I diagnoses were present in 74.8% of the participants overall with the DYS subgroup mainly reporting anxiety and the ID group mood disorders. The AC group showed little comorbidity. Axis II diagnoses were present in only 8.7% of the FMS sample.
These results suggest that FMS is not a homogeneous diagnosis, but shows varying proportions of comorbid anxiety and depression dependent on psychosocial characteristics of the patients. The results demonstrate the importance of not treating patients with FMS as a homogeneous group. Assessment should not only examine the presence of widespread pain and the number of tender points, but also the presence of affective distress. Treatment should focus both on physical and emotional dysfunction.
评估纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)患者精神障碍(《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第4版[DSM-IV]轴I和轴II)的患病率及预测因素。
115例FMS患者参与了DSM-IV结构化临床访谈以评估当前的精神障碍。此外,患者还完成了关于疼痛、疼痛影响、焦虑、抑郁、创伤后应激障碍样症状以及性虐待和身体虐待的标准化问卷。
根据多维疼痛量表(MPI)的反应,患者被分为三个心理社会亚组之一——功能失调型(DYS)、人际困扰型(ID)和适应性应对型(AC)。总体而言,74.8%的参与者存在轴I诊断,其中DYS亚组主要报告焦虑,ID组主要报告情绪障碍。AC组的共病情况较少。FMS样本中仅8.7%存在轴II诊断。
这些结果表明,FMS并非一种同质化的诊断,而是根据患者的心理社会特征显示出不同比例的共病焦虑和抑郁。结果表明,不应将FMS患者作为一个同质化群体进行治疗。评估不仅应检查广泛疼痛的存在情况和压痛点的数量,还应检查情感困扰的存在情况。治疗应同时关注身体和情绪功能障碍。