Suppr超能文献

家庭吸烟状况与外出就餐、酒类、赌博及保险方面的支出有关联吗?来自澳大利亚1998 - 1999年家庭支出调查的结果。

Is household smoking status associated with expenditure on food at restaurants, alcohol, gambling and insurance? Results from the 1998-99 Household Expenditure Survey, Australia.

作者信息

Siahpush M, Borland R, Scollo M

机构信息

VicHealth Centre for Tobacco Control, Cancer Control Research Institute, The Cancer Council Victoria, 100 Drummond Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3053, Australia.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2004 Dec;13(4):409-14. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.004770.

Abstract

AIM

To examine how household expenditure on food at restaurants, alcohol, gambling and insurance vary between smoking and non-smoking households.

DESIGN

Cross sectional survey of households from private dwellings, conducted by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), using a stratified multistage area sample design.

SETTING

Australia, 1998-99.

PARTICIPANTS

Nationally representative sample of households (n = 6892).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Expenditure on meals at restaurants, alcohol, alcoholic beverages at licensed premises, gambling, and insurance.

RESULTS

The odds of reporting expenditure on restaurant food and health insurance were 20% and 40% smaller for smoking than non-smoking households, respectively. The odds of reporting expenditure on alcohol (not including expenditure at licensed premises), drinking at licensed premises, and gambling were 100%, 50%, and 40% greater for smoking than for non-smoking households, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests that smokers are more likely to engage in risky behaviour. Implementing smoking bans in licensed premises and gambling venues can provide an opportunity to reduce smoking prevalence. Quitting or cutting down smoking can provide opportunities for expenditure on other products or services, and enhance standards of living.

摘要

目的

研究吸烟家庭和非吸烟家庭在餐厅食品、酒精饮料、赌博及保险方面的家庭支出情况有何不同。

设计

澳大利亚统计局(ABS)采用分层多阶段区域抽样设计,对私人住宅中的家庭进行横断面调查。

地点

澳大利亚,1998 - 1999年。

参与者

具有全国代表性的家庭样本(n = 6892)。

主要观察指标

餐厅用餐、酒精饮料、有执照场所的酒精饮品、赌博及保险方面的支出。

结果

报告在餐厅食品和健康保险方面有支出的吸烟家庭的几率分别比非吸烟家庭低20%和40%。报告在酒精饮料(不包括有执照场所的支出)、在有执照场所饮酒及赌博方面有支出的吸烟家庭的几率分别比非吸烟家庭高100%、50%和40%。

结论

该研究表明吸烟者更有可能从事危险行为。在有执照场所和赌博场所实施禁烟措施可为降低吸烟率提供契机。戒烟或减少吸烟可为其他产品或服务的支出创造机会,并提高生活水平。

相似文献

4
Smoking and financial stress.吸烟与经济压力。
Tob Control. 2003 Mar;12(1):60-6. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.1.60.

引用本文的文献

1
Inequality of the crowding-out effect of tobacco expenditure in Colombia.哥伦比亚烟草支出挤出效应的不平等性。
PLoS One. 2024 May 21;19(5):e0303328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303328. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

5
The effect of a smoke-free law on restaurant business in South Australia.无烟法律对南澳大利亚州餐厅生意的影响。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2002 Aug;26(4):375-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2002.tb00190.x.
10
Consumer response to the New York City Smoke-Free Air Act.消费者对纽约市无烟空气法案的反应。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):28-36. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199901000-00006.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验