Elzen Patti J, Westervelt David, Lucas Raymond
USDA-ARS, Kika de la Garza Subtropical Agricultural Research Center, 2413 E. Highway 83, Weslaco, TX 78596, USA.
J Econ Entomol. 2004 Oct;97(5):1509-12. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493-97.5.1509.
The efficacy of a formic acid pad formulation was field tested for control of the honey bee parasitic mite Varroa destructor Anderson & Trueman in Florida and Texas. This pad formulation gave 39.8 +/- 11.1% control at the end of a 6-wk treatment period, which did not significantly differ from the initial sample date. Coumaphos treatment provided poor control (38.4 +/- 11.1%) over the 6-wk period, confirming reports of coumaphos resistance in the region. Under relatively warm winter conditions in southern Texas, formic acid caused mortality of developing eggs and brood. If resistance by V. destructor to the two acaricides registered for its control in the United States continues, the formic acid pad could provide an alternative compound to use as part of an integrated pest management approach. Given the low control seen in this trial, however, modifications of application technology would seem necessary.
对一种甲酸垫配方控制佛罗里达州和得克萨斯州蜜蜂寄生螨狄斯瓦螨(Varroa destructor Anderson & Trueman)的效果进行了田间试验。在为期6周的处理期结束时,这种垫配方的防治率为39.8±11.1%,与初始采样日期相比无显著差异。在6周期间,蝇毒磷处理的防治效果较差(38.4±11.1%),证实了该地区对蝇毒磷有抗性的报道。在得克萨斯州南部相对温暖的冬季条件下,甲酸会导致发育中的卵和幼虫死亡。如果狄斯瓦螨对美国注册用于防治它的两种杀螨剂继续产生抗性,甲酸垫可作为综合虫害管理方法的一部分,提供一种可供选择的化合物。然而,鉴于本试验中看到的防治效果较低,似乎有必要对应用技术进行改进。