Kanga Lambert H B, Jones Walker A, Gracia Carlos
Entomology/CESTA, Florida A&M University, 406 Perry-Paige Building, Tallahassee, FL 32307, USA.
Exp Appl Acarol. 2006;40(3-4):249-58. doi: 10.1007/s10493-006-9033-2. Epub 2007 Jan 4.
Strips coated with conidia of Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschinkoff; Deuteromycetes: Hyphomycetes) to control the parasitic mite, Varroa destructor (Anderson and Trueman) in colonies of honey bees, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) were compared against the miticide, tau-fluvalinate (Apistan) in field trials in Texas and Florida (USA). Apistan and the fungal treatments resulted in successful control of mite populations in both locations. At the end of the 42-day period of the experiment in Texas, the number of mites per bee was reduced by 69-fold in bee hives treated with Apistan and 25-fold in hives treated with the fungus; however mite infestations increased by 1.3-fold in the control bee hives. Similarly, the number of mites in sealed brood was 13-fold and 3.6-fold higher in the control bee hives than in those treated with Apistan and with the fungus, respectively. Like the miticide Apistan, the fungal treatments provided a significant reduction of mite populations at the end of the experimental period. The data from the broodless colonies treated with the fungus indicated that optimum mite control could be achieved when no brood is being produced, or when brood production is low, such as in the early spring or late fall. In established colonies in Florida, honey bee colony development did not increase under either Apistan or fungal treatments at the end of the experimental period, suggesting that other factors (queen health, food source, food availability) play some major role in the growth of bee colonies. Overall, microbial control of Varroa mites with fungal pathogens could be a useful component of an integrated pest management program for the honey bee industry.
在德克萨斯州和佛罗里达州(美国)进行的田间试验中,将涂有绿僵菌(Metschinkoff;半知菌纲:丝孢纲)分生孢子的条带用于控制蜜蜂(Apis mellifera,膜翅目:蜜蜂科)蜂群中的寄生螨——狄斯瓦螨(Anderson和Trueman),并与杀螨剂氟胺氰菊酯(Apistan)进行了比较。Apistan和真菌处理在两个地点均成功控制了螨种群数量。在德克萨斯州为期42天的试验结束时,用Apistan处理的蜂箱中每只蜜蜂身上的螨数量减少了69倍,用真菌处理的蜂箱中减少了25倍;然而,对照蜂箱中的螨侵扰增加了1.3倍。同样,对照蜂箱中封盖子脾中的螨数量分别比用Apistan和真菌处理的蜂箱高13倍和3.6倍。与杀螨剂Apistan一样,真菌处理在试验期结束时显著减少了螨种群数量。用真菌处理无幼虫蜂群的数据表明,在不产幼虫或幼虫产量低时,如早春或晚秋,可以实现对螨的最佳控制。在佛罗里达州已建立的蜂群中,试验期结束时,在Apistan或真菌处理下,蜜蜂蜂群的发展均未增加,这表明其他因素(蜂王健康、食物来源、食物可获得性)在蜂群生长中起一些主要作用。总体而言,用真菌病原体对狄斯瓦螨进行微生物控制可能是蜜蜂产业综合害虫管理计划的一个有用组成部分。