'Efficacy' of esophageal peristalsis: a manometric parameter to quantify esophageal body dysfunction.

Esophageal motor abnormalities are currently categorized into separate entities based on standard manometry. The clinical significance of these categories is controversial. We evaluated whether ambulatory 24-h esophageal motility monitoring improves the assessment of patients thought to have a primary esophageal motor disorder. Standard and ambulatory 24-h esophageal motility records of 30 healthy volunteers and 136 symptomatic patients were compared. Regression analysis was used to identify parameters that relate to the presence of nonobstructive dysphagia. Prolonged ambulatory esophageal monitoring showed a marked circadian variation in the esophageal motor pattern and significant discrepancies to the findings on standard manometry in 47% of the 136 patients. Discrepancies were particularly frequent in patients categorized on standard manometry as having a 'nutcracker esophagus' or a nonspecific motor disorder. Of all data obtained, the prevalence of 'effective contractions', i.e. peristaltic contractions with an amplitude > 30 mmHg, during meal periods provided the best correlation with the presence of nonobstructive dysphagia. Of the 78 patients with nonobstructive dysphagia 71 (92%) had less than 50% of 'effective contractions' during meals. In five patients who had frequent simultaneous wave forms and less than 70%'effective contractions' during meals a long myotomy markedly reduced the severity of dysphagia. The 'efficacy' of esophageal contractions during meals best relates to patients' symptoms and allows expression of esophageal body dysfunction on a linear scale. This obviates the need for the current categories of esophageal motor disorders, permits an objective assessment of medical therapy and may improve the identification of patients that benefit from a surgical myotomy of the esophageal body.