López Ornat Susana, Gallo Pilar
Complutense University of Madrid, Spain.
Span J Psychol. 2004 Nov;7(2):161-70. doi: 10.1017/s1138741600004868.
In 1957, Skinner, in his "Verbal Behavior", proposed an explanation on how a language is learned. In 1959, Chomsky strongly argued the non-learnability of language, establishing in the field of developmental psycholinguistics the substitution of the term "learning" for that of "acquisition". Currently, the constructivist models describe language acquisition as a process of ontogenetic, gradual, complex, and adaptive change. This new theoretical framework has been especially useful for rereading Verbal Behavior because it facilitates recovering the Skinnerian learning mechanisms. This can be observed in the recent research trends that recapture reinforcement and imitation (echoic responses), although they are now located in the initial phases of the process and are included in a cognitive dynamic that, by gradually increasing its complexity, can achieve grammar. The new constructivist theoretical framework, by retrieving the functional and referential aspects of language, can also take advantage of the classic Skinnerian proposal about the pragmatic types of verbal behavior, providing it with new meaning.
1957年,斯金纳在其《言语行为》中提出了关于语言习得方式的一种解释。1959年,乔姆斯基强烈反对语言的可习得性,在发展心理语言学领域用“习得”一词取代了“学习”。目前,建构主义模型将语言习得描述为一个个体发生、渐进、复杂且适应性变化的过程。这个新的理论框架对于重新解读《言语行为》特别有用,因为它有助于还原斯金纳的学习机制。这一点可以从最近的研究趋势中看出,这些研究重新探讨了强化和模仿(回声反应),尽管它们现在处于这个过程的初始阶段,并被纳入一个认知动态过程中,这个认知动态过程通过逐渐增加其复杂性可以实现语法。新的建构主义理论框架通过恢复语言的功能和指称方面,也能够利用斯金纳关于言语行为语用类型的经典提议,并赋予其新的意义。