Suppr超能文献

对四项高被引能量和疲劳情绪测量指标的评估。

Evaluation of four highly cited energy and fatigue mood measures.

作者信息

O'Connor Patrick J

机构信息

Department of Exercise Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-6554, USA.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 2004 Nov;57(5):435-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2003.12.006.

Abstract

This paper evaluates four highly cited measures of energy and fatigue moods. Substantial experimental and correlational evidence supports the conclusion that scores from the vitality scale of the SF-36 Health Survey can provide a valid measure of the recalled frequency of month-long feelings of energy and fatigue. Substantial experimental and correlational evidence supports the conclusion that scores from the fatigue and vigor scales of the Profile of Mood States (POMS) can provide reliable and valid measures the intensity of both week-long and "right now" fatigue and energy mood states, respectively. A smaller body of evidence supports the conclusion that scores from the energy scale of the Activation-Deactivation Adjective Checklist (AD-ACL) can provide a valid measure of the "right now" mood of energy; however, the energy scale of the AD-ACL has several limitations compared to the POMS vigor scale. All the measures lacked integration within a compelling theory of the mood of energy-fatigue. It is concluded that progress in understanding of energy and fatigue mood states will be aided by advances in both the psychobiological conceptualization of fatigue and energy mood states and their measurement.

摘要

本文评估了四种被高度引用的能量和疲劳情绪测量方法。大量的实验和相关证据支持以下结论:SF-36健康调查活力量表的得分能够有效衡量长达一个月的精力充沛和疲劳感受的回忆频率。大量的实验和相关证据支持以下结论:情绪状态剖面图(POMS)疲劳量表和活力量表的得分能够分别可靠且有效地衡量为期一周以及“当下”的疲劳和精力充沛情绪状态的强度。较少的证据支持以下结论:激活-失活形容词检查表(AD-ACL)能量量表的得分能够有效衡量“当下”的精力充沛情绪;然而,与POMS活力量表相比,AD-ACL能量量表存在若干局限性。所有这些测量方法都缺乏在一个令人信服的能量-疲劳情绪理论中的整合。结论是,对疲劳和精力充沛情绪状态的心理生物学概念化及其测量的进展将有助于增进对能量和疲劳情绪状态的理解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验