Greilhuber Johann, Dolezel Jaroslav, Lysák Martin A, Bennett Michael D
Institute of Botany and Botanical Garden of the University of Vienna, Austria.
Ann Bot. 2005 Jan;95(1):255-60. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci019.
Perusing the literature on nuclear 'genome size' shows that the term is not stabilized, but applied with different meanings. It is used for the DNA content of the complete chromosome complement (with chromosome number n), for which others use 'C-value', but also for the DNA content of the monoploid chromosome set only (with chromosome number x). Reconsideration of the terminology is required.
Our purpose is to discuss the currently unstable usage of the terms 'genome size' and 'C-value', and to propose a new unified terminology which can describe nuclear DNA contents with ease and without ambiguity.
We argue that there is a need to maintain the term genome size in a broad sense as a covering term, because it is widely understood, short and phonetically pleasing. Proposals are made for a unified and consensual terminology. In this, 'genome size' should mean the DNA content based on chromosome number x and n, and should be used mainly in a general sense. The necessary distinction of the kinds of genome sizes is made by the adjectives 'monoploid' and the neology 'holoploid'. 'Holoploid genome size' is a shortcut for the DNA content of the whole chromosome complement characteristic for the individual (and by generalization for the population, species, etc.) irrespective of the degree of generative polyploidy, aneuploidies, etc. This term was lacking in the terminology and is for reasons of linguistic consistency indispensable. The abbreviated terms for monoploid and holoploid genome size are, respectively, Cx-value and C-value. Quantitative data on genome size should always indicate the C-level by a numerical prefix, such as 1C, 1Cx, 2C, etc. The proposed conventions cover general fundamental aspects relating to genome size in plants and animals, but do not treat in detail cytogenetic particularities (e.g. haploids, hybrids, etc.) which will need minor extensions of the present scheme in a future paper.
研读有关核“基因组大小”的文献表明,该术语尚未稳定下来,而是有着不同的含义。它用于表示完整染色体组(染色体数为n)的DNA含量,其他人则用“C值”来表示此含义,但它也用于仅表示单倍体染色体组(染色体数为x)的DNA含量。因此需要重新考虑术语。
我们的目的是讨论“基因组大小”和“C值”这两个术语目前不稳定的用法,并提出一种新的统一术语,以便轻松且明确地描述核DNA含量。
我们认为有必要从广义上保留“基因组大小”这一术语作为涵盖性术语,因为它广为人知、简短且发音悦耳。我们提出了一个统一且达成共识的术语。在此,“基因组大小”应指基于染色体数x和n的DNA含量,且主要应在一般意义上使用。通过形容词“单倍体”和新造词“全倍体”对基因组大小的种类进行必要区分。“全倍体基因组大小”是个体(以及通过推广适用于种群、物种等)整个染色体组特征的DNA含量的简称,无论其生殖多倍体程度、非整倍体等情况如何。该术语在现有术语中缺失,出于语言一致性的原因是不可或缺的。单倍体和全倍体基因组大小的缩写术语分别为Cx值和C值。基因组大小的定量数据应始终通过数字前缀表明C水平,如1C、1Cx、2C等。所提议的惯例涵盖了与动植物基因组大小相关的一般基本方面,但未详细处理细胞遗传学特殊性(如单倍体、杂种等),这些将在未来的论文中对本方案进行细微扩展。