Brackenbury Angela M, McCaig Lynda A, Yao Li-Juan, Veldhuizen Ruud A W, Lewis James F
Department of Medicine, St. Joseph's Health Care Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Crit Care Med. 2004 Dec;32(12):2502-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000148010.08296.9a.
Pneumonia occurs in approximately 7% of hospitalized patients. Susceptibility to certain bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa increases in critically ill patients, particularly those requiring mechanical ventilation. Previous studies investigating this susceptibility have used injurious modes of ventilation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the host's response to intratracheal instillation of P. aeruginosa in the setting of noninjurious mechanical ventilation and compare this with normal, spontaneously breathing animals receiving bacteria.
Randomized, controlled in vivo animal study.
Research laboratory at a university-affiliated institution.
Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats.
Rats were randomized into four groups: spontaneously breathing given saline, spontaneously breathing given bacteria, mechanically ventilated given saline, and mechanically ventilated given bacteria. The ventilation strategy used involved low stretch (tidal volume of 8 mL/kg) with a positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cm H2O.
Lung compliance, bacterial recovery, surfactant, total cells, and cytokine concentrations in the lung lavage were analyzed after 4 hrs. Results showed that neither ventilation nor bacteria alone altered lung function, although the combination of ventilation and Pseudomonas significantly decreased arterial oxygenation and lung compliance. Increases in lavage cell counts, cytokines, and surfactant were observed in both groups administered bacteria compared with animals given saline. However, there were no significant differences in bacterial recovery, cell counts, cytokines, and surfactant measurements in the groups given bacteria.
These data suggest that bacterial instillation with low-stretch ventilation had a significant effect on lung function but did not alter the inflammatory response to a bacterial challenge over this time course compared with spontaneously breathing animals.
约7%的住院患者会发生肺炎。危重症患者,尤其是需要机械通气的患者,对某些细菌如铜绿假单胞菌的易感性会增加。以往研究这种易感性时采用的是损伤性通气模式。本研究的目的是评估在非损伤性机械通气情况下,宿主对气管内注入铜绿假单胞菌的反应,并将其与接受细菌注入的正常自主呼吸动物进行比较。
随机对照体内动物研究。
大学附属机构的研究实验室。
成年雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠。
将大鼠随机分为四组:自主呼吸给予生理盐水组、自主呼吸给予细菌组、机械通气给予生理盐水组和机械通气给予细菌组。所采用的通气策略包括低张力(潮气量8 mL/kg)和呼气末正压5 cm H2O。
4小时后分析肺顺应性、细菌回收量、表面活性剂、肺灌洗中的总细胞数和细胞因子浓度。结果显示,单独的通气或细菌注入均未改变肺功能,尽管通气和铜绿假单胞菌联合作用显著降低了动脉氧合和肺顺应性。与给予生理盐水的动物相比,给予细菌的两组动物肺灌洗细胞计数、细胞因子和表面活性剂均增加。然而,给予细菌的各组在细菌回收量、细胞计数、细胞因子和表面活性剂测量方面无显著差异。
这些数据表明,与自主呼吸动物相比,低张力通气下注入细菌对肺功能有显著影响,但在这段时间内并未改变对细菌攻击的炎症反应。