Suppr超能文献

“抓取”与优秀科研:定性研究结果的撰写

"Grab" and good science: writing up the results of qualitative research.

作者信息

Gilgun Jane F

机构信息

University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, St Paul, USA.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2005 Feb;15(2):256-62. doi: 10.1177/1049732304268796.

Abstract

Qualitative researchers have an array of choices in how to write up their research. Yet many write in distanced, third-person voices and give short shrift to the voices of informants, as if neither they nor their informants were part of the research. In doing so, they might believe that their writing style is scientific. Unfortunately, such styles of writing not only silence their informants and themselves, but many times they also contradict the philosophies of science on which many forms of qualitative research are based. If our philosophies of science are science, then how we write up our research, when it is consistent with our science, must logically be scientific. "Grab," or writing that is both interesting and memorable, goes hand in hand with good science.

摘要

定性研究人员在如何撰写他们的研究方面有一系列选择。然而,许多人以一种疏离的第三人称口吻写作,对被调查者的声音重视不足,仿佛他们自己和被调查者都不是研究的一部分。这样做时,他们可能认为自己的写作风格是科学的。不幸的是,这种写作风格不仅使被调查者和他们自己的声音沉默,而且很多时候还与许多定性研究形式所基于的科学理念相矛盾。如果我们的科学理念就是科学,那么当我们撰写研究报告时,只要与我们的科学理念一致,从逻辑上讲就必然是科学的。“引人入胜”,即既有趣又令人难忘的写作,与优秀的科学是相辅相成的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验