• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于家系的关联分析中的亲代表型

Parental phenotypes in family-based association analysis.

作者信息

Purcell Shaun, Sham Pak, Daly Mark J

机构信息

Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hum Genet. 2005 Feb;76(2):249-59. doi: 10.1086/427886. Epub 2004 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1086/427886
PMID:15614722
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1196370/
Abstract

Family-based association designs are popular, because they offer inherent control of population stratification based on age, sex, ethnicity, and environmental exposure. However, the efficiency of these designs is hampered by current analytic strategies that consider only offspring phenotypes. Here, we describe the incorporation of parental phenotypes and, specifically, the inclusion of parental genotype-phenotype correlation terms in association tests, providing a series of tests that effectively span an efficiency-robustness spectrum. The model is based on the between-within-sibship association model presented in 1999 by Fulker and colleagues for quantitative traits and extended here to nuclear families. By use of a liability-threshold-model approach, standard dichotomous and/or qualitative disease phenotypes can be analyzed (and can include appropriate corrections for phenotypically ascertained samples), which allows for the application of this model to analysis of the commonly used affected-proband trio design. We show that the incorporation of parental phenotypes can considerably increase power, as compared with the standard transmission/disequilibrium test and equivalent quantitative tests, while providing both significant protection against stratification and a means of evaluating the contribution of stratification to positive results. This methodology enables the extraction of more information from existing family-based collections that are currently being genotyped and analyzed by use of standard approaches.

摘要

基于家系的关联设计很受欢迎,因为它们能对基于年龄、性别、种族和环境暴露的人群分层进行内在控制。然而,目前仅考虑后代表型的分析策略阻碍了这些设计的效率。在此,我们描述了纳入亲代表型,特别是在关联测试中纳入亲代基因型-表型相关项,提供了一系列能有效跨越效率-稳健性范围的测试。该模型基于1999年富尔克及其同事提出的用于数量性状的同胞间关联模型,并在此扩展到核心家庭。通过使用阈值模型方法,可以分析标准的二分法和/或定性疾病表型(并且可以包括对表型确定样本的适当校正),这使得该模型能够应用于常用的患病先证者三人组设计的分析。我们表明,与标准传递/不平衡测试和等效的定量测试相比,纳入亲代表型可以显著提高检验效能,同时提供对分层的显著保护以及评估分层对阳性结果贡献的方法。这种方法能够从目前正在使用标准方法进行基因分型和分析的现有基于家系的样本集中提取更多信息。

相似文献

1
Parental phenotypes in family-based association analysis.基于家系的关联分析中的亲代表型
Am J Hum Genet. 2005 Feb;76(2):249-59. doi: 10.1086/427886. Epub 2004 Dec 21.
2
A general framework for robust and efficient association analysis in family-based designs: quantitative and dichotomous phenotypes.基于家系设计的稳健高效关联分析通用框架:定量和二分法表型
Stat Med. 2013 Nov 10;32(25):4482-98. doi: 10.1002/sim.5865. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
3
Method for using complete and incomplete trios to identify genes related to a quantitative trait.使用完整和不完整三联体鉴定与数量性状相关基因的方法。
Genet Epidemiol. 2004 Jul;27(1):33-42. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20001.
4
Tests for genetic association using family data.使用家系数据进行基因关联测试。
Genet Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;22(2):128-45. doi: 10.1002/gepi.0151.
5
Testing quantitative traits for association and linkage in the presence or absence of parental data.在有或没有亲本数据的情况下,对数量性状进行关联和连锁测试。
Hum Hered. 2001;51(4):183-91. doi: 10.1159/000053341.
6
Single Marker Family-Based Association Analysis Conditional on Parental Information.基于父母信息的单标记家系关联分析。
Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1666:391-407. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7274-6_19.
7
Family-based designs in the age of large-scale gene-association studies.大规模基因关联研究时代的基于家系的设计。
Nat Rev Genet. 2006 May;7(5):385-94. doi: 10.1038/nrg1839.
8
Statistical equivalent of the classical TDT for quantitative traits and multivariate phenotypes.用于数量性状和多变量表型的经典传递不平衡检验(TDT)的统计等效方法。
J Genet. 2015 Dec;94(4):619-28. doi: 10.1007/s12041-015-0563-4.
9
Sibling-based tests of linkage and association for quantitative traits.基于同胞的数量性状连锁和关联检验。
Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Jun;64(6):1754-63. doi: 10.1086/302404.
10
Weighted Transmission Disequilibrium Test for Family Trio Association Design.用于家系三联体关联设计的加权传递不平衡检验
Hum Hered. 2018;83(4):196-209. doi: 10.1159/000494353. Epub 2019 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Human genetic variation reveals FCRL3 is a lymphocyte receptor for .人类基因变异表明FCRL3是……的淋巴细胞受体。
bioRxiv. 2024 Dec 8:2024.12.05.626452. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.05.626452.
2
Pharmacogenomics: A Genetic Approach to Drug Development and Therapy.药物基因组学:药物研发与治疗的遗传学方法。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Jul 13;17(7):940. doi: 10.3390/ph17070940.
3
Human variation impacting restricts Typhi replication by magnesium deprivation.影响人类的变异通过剥夺镁来限制伤寒杆菌的复制。
Cell Genom. 2023 Apr 4;3(5):100290. doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2023.100290. eCollection 2023 May 10.
4
Disentangling the aetiological pathways between body mass index and site-specific cancer risk using tissue-partitioned Mendelian randomisation.利用组织分区孟德尔随机化方法解析体重指数与特定部位癌症风险之间的病因途径。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Feb;128(4):618-625. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-02060-6. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
5
Clotting factor genes are associated with preeclampsia in high-altitude pregnant women in the Peruvian Andes.凝血因子基因与秘鲁安第斯山脉高海拔地区孕妇的先兆子痫有关。
Am J Hum Genet. 2022 Jun 2;109(6):1117-1139. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.04.014. Epub 2022 May 18.
6
Human genetic diversity regulating the locus confers increased cytokines in response to .调控该基因座的人类遗传多样性会导致对……产生更多细胞因子。
HGG Adv. 2021 Nov 25;3(1):100071. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2021.100071. eCollection 2022 Jan 13.
7
Modeling of variables in cellular infection reveals CXCL10 levels are regulated by human genetic variation and the Chlamydia-encoded CPAF protease.细胞感染中变量的建模表明,CXCL10 水平受人类遗传变异和衣原体编码的 CPAF 蛋白酶的调节。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 26;10(1):18269. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75129-y.
8
Assessing Digital Phenotyping to Enhance Genetic Studies of Human Diseases.评估数字表型学以增强人类疾病的遗传研究。
Am J Hum Genet. 2020 May 7;106(5):611-622. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.03.007. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
9
Robust Rare-Variant Association Tests For Quantitative Traits in General Pedigrees.一般家系中数量性状的稳健罕见变异关联检验
Stat Biosci. 2018 Dec;10(3):491-505. doi: 10.1007/s12561-017-9197-9. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
10
Genetic Association and Altered Gene Expression of in Multiple Sclerosis Patients.多发性硬化症患者中[具体基因]的遗传关联及基因表达改变
Biomedicines. 2018 Dec 18;6(4):117. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines6040117.

本文引用的文献

1
Properties of structured association approaches to detecting population stratification.用于检测群体分层的结构化关联方法的特性
Hum Hered. 2004;58(2):93-107. doi: 10.1159/000083030.
2
Genetic Power Calculator: design of linkage and association genetic mapping studies of complex traits.遗传力计算器:复杂性状连锁与关联遗传图谱研究的设计
Bioinformatics. 2003 Jan;19(1):149-50. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.1.149.
3
Pedigree tests of transmission disequilibrium.传递不平衡的系谱检验
Eur J Hum Genet. 2000 Jul;8(7):545-51. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200494.
4
Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.利用多位点基因型数据推断群体结构。
Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945-59. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.2.945.
5
Power of linkage versus association analysis of quantitative traits, by use of variance-components models, for sibship data.利用方差成分模型对同胞数据进行数量性状连锁分析与关联分析的功效比较。
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 May;66(5):1616-30. doi: 10.1086/302891. Epub 2000 Apr 12.
6
A general test of association for quantitative traits in nuclear families.核心家庭中数量性状关联的一般检验。
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Jan;66(1):279-92. doi: 10.1086/302698.
7
Combined linkage and association sib-pair analysis for quantitative traits.数量性状的联合连锁与关联同胞对分析。
Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Jan;64(1):259-67. doi: 10.1086/302193.
8
The effect of family structure on linkage tests using allelic association.家庭结构对使用等位基因关联的连锁测试的影响。
Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Sep;63(3):889-97. doi: 10.1086/302008.
9
Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM).连锁不平衡的传递测试:胰岛素基因区域与胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(IDDM)
Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Mar;52(3):506-16.