Kostenis Evi, Martini Lene, Ellis James, Waldhoer Maria, Heydorn Arne, Rosenkilde Mette M, Norregaard Pia K, Jorgensen Rasmus, Whistler Jennifer L, Milligan Graeme
7TM Pharma, Fremtidsvej 3, 2970 Hoersholm, Denmark.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005 Apr;313(1):78-87. doi: 10.1124/jpet.104.080424. Epub 2004 Dec 22.
Numerous studies have attested to the importance of the extreme C terminus of G protein alpha subunits in determining their selectivity of receptor recognition. We have previously reported that a highly conserved glycine residue within linker I is important for constraining the fidelity of receptor recognition by Galpha(q) proteins. Herein, we explored whether both modules (linker I and extreme C terminus) interact cooperatively in switching G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-to-effector specificity and created as models mutant Galpha(q) proteins in which glycine was replaced with various amino acids and the C-terminal five Galpha(q) residues with the corresponding Galpha(i) or Galpha(s) sequence. Coupling properties of the mutated Galpha(q) proteins were determined after coexpression with a panel of 13 G(i)-and G(s) -selective receptors and compared with those of Galpha proteins modified in only one module. Galpha proteins modified in both modules are significantly more efficacious in channeling non-G(q) -selective receptors to G(q)-mediated signaling events compare with those containing each module alone. Additive effects of both modules were observed even if individual modules lacked an effect on GPCR-to-effector specificity. Dually modified Galpha proteins were also superior in conferring high-affinity agonist sites onto a coexpressed GPCR in the absence, but not in the presence, of guanine nucleotides. Together, our data suggest that receptor-G protein coupling selectivity involves cooperative interactions between the extreme C terminus and linker I of Galpha proteins and that distinct determinants of selectivity exist for individual receptors.
众多研究证实了G蛋白α亚基的极端C末端在决定其受体识别选择性方面的重要性。我们之前报道过,连接区I内一个高度保守的甘氨酸残基对于限制Gα(q)蛋白识别受体的保真度很重要。在此,我们探究了这两个模块(连接区I和极端C末端)在转换G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)到效应器特异性方面是否协同相互作用,并构建了突变型Gα(q)蛋白模型,其中甘氨酸被替换为各种氨基酸,并且Gα(q)的C末端五个残基被相应的Gα(i)或Gα(s)序列取代。在与一组13种G(i)和G(s)选择性受体共表达后,测定突变型Gα(q)蛋白的偶联特性,并与仅在一个模块中修饰的Gα蛋白的偶联特性进行比较。与单独包含每个模块的Gα蛋白相比,在两个模块中都进行修饰的Gα蛋白在将非G(q)选择性受体引导至G(q)介导的信号事件方面明显更有效。即使单个模块对GPCR到效应器的特异性没有影响,也观察到了两个模块的加性效应。在不存在鸟嘌呤核苷酸但存在鸟嘌呤核苷酸时,双重修饰的Gα蛋白在赋予共表达的GPCR高亲和力激动剂位点方面也更具优势。总之,我们的数据表明,受体 - G蛋白偶联选择性涉及Gα蛋白的极端C末端和连接区I之间的协同相互作用,并且单个受体存在不同的选择性决定因素。