Bishop Dorothy V M, Norbury Courtenay Frazier
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Autism. 2005 Feb;9(1):29-43. doi: 10.1177/1362361305049028.
Although impairment in executive functions has been described in autism, there has been debate as to whether response inhibition is specifically affected. We compared four groups: high-functioning autism; pragmatic language impairment; specific language impairment; and control. Inhibition was assessed using two subtests from the Test of Everyday Attention for Children, one requiring a verbal response and the other a non-verbal response. Although we found evidence of inhibitory deficits, these were neither specific to autism, nor linked to particular aspects of autistic symptomatology. Rather, they appeared to be associated with poor verbal skills and inattention. It is suggested that future studies need to control for structural language skills and attention deficit when evaluating cognitive deficits in autism. Reliance on control groups matched solely on vocabulary level or nonverbal mental age may obscure the important role played by language skills in executive functions.
尽管自闭症患者的执行功能存在损伤已有相关描述,但对于反应抑制是否受到特定影响仍存在争议。我们比较了四组人群:高功能自闭症患者;语用语言障碍患者;特定语言障碍患者;以及对照组。使用《儿童日常注意力测试》中的两个子测试评估抑制能力,一个要求言语反应,另一个要求非言语反应。尽管我们发现了抑制缺陷的证据,但这些缺陷既不是自闭症所特有的,也与自闭症症状的特定方面无关。相反,它们似乎与言语技能差和注意力不集中有关。建议未来的研究在评估自闭症患者的认知缺陷时,需要控制结构语言技能和注意力缺陷。仅根据词汇水平或非言语心理年龄匹配对照组可能会掩盖语言技能在执行功能中所起的重要作用。