Szekely Anna, D'Amico Simonetta, Devescovi Antonella, Federmeier Kara, Herron Dan, Iyer Gowri, Jacobsen Thomas, Arévalo Analía L, Vargha Andras, Bates Elizabeth
Department of General and Experimental Psychology, Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest, Hungary.
Cortex. 2005 Feb;41(1):7-25. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70174-6.
Factors affecting object and action naming were compared in a timed picture-naming paradigm, for drawings of 520 objects and 275 actions, named by adult native speakers of English. Massive differences between object and action naming were observed for all dependent variables, and theoretically relevant differences emerged in the variables that predict retrieval of nouns vs. verbs in this task. Matching object and action items for variables like frequency, age of acquisition, or picture complexity does not result in a match for measures of naming difficulty (name agreement or latency). Conversely, object and action items matched for naming difficulty invariably differ in their other lexical and pictorial properties. A reaction time disadvantage for action naming remains even after controlling for picture properties, target word properties, name agreement itself (reflecting the differential ambiguity of nouns and verbs) as well as a measure of conceptual or psychological complexity based on the number of relevant objects in the scene. Surprisingly, frequency effects run in opposite directions for nouns (higher frequencies yield faster RTs) and verbs (higher frequencies are associated with slower RTs, reflecting a "light verb" strategy that speakers use for difficult items). Implications for method and theory in the study of lexical access are discussed, including relevance to a growing literature on the neurobiology and development of nouns and verbs.
在一个限时图片命名范式中,研究人员比较了影响物体和动作命名的因素,该范式涉及520个物体和275个动作的图片,由以英语为母语的成年人命名。在所有因变量上,物体命名和动作命名之间都观察到了巨大差异,并且在预测该任务中名词与动词检索的变量中出现了理论上相关的差异。使物体和动作项目在频率、习得年龄或图片复杂度等变量上匹配,并不会导致命名难度测量指标(命名一致性或潜伏期)的匹配。相反,在命名难度上匹配的物体和动作项目在其他词汇和图片属性上总是存在差异。即使在控制了图片属性、目标词属性、命名一致性本身(反映名词和动词的不同歧义性)以及基于场景中相关物体数量的概念或心理复杂度测量指标之后,动作命名的反应时间劣势仍然存在。令人惊讶的是,频率效应在名词(频率越高,反应时间越快)和动词(频率越高,反应时间越慢,这反映了说话者用于处理困难项目的“轻动词”策略)上的方向相反。本文讨论了词汇通达研究中方法和理论的相关问题,包括与关于名词和动词的神经生物学及发展的不断增长的文献的相关性。