• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年轻人和老年人在语言转换时内部和之间的语言控制比较。

A comparison of language control while switching within versus between languages in younger and older adults.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.

Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 5;13(1):16740. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43886-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-43886-1
PMID:37798366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10555994/
Abstract

Word retrieval during language production slows down with age. However, bilinguals also require language control to manage language competition, in particular when switching languages to cues. The current study examined how this bilingual language control differs between younger and older adults. It also compared bilingual control, and age-group differences, to control that might be applied when alternating between responses within one language. In Experiment 1, 40 younger and 40 older monolingual adults completed a task alternating between noun and verb responses to pictures. The task showed costs associated with language control but these did not differ between age groups. Experiment 2 was completed by 50 older and 50 younger bilingual adults. Older adults showed larger switching costs than younger adults when switching between and within languages, suggesting they experienced more difficulty with reactive control. However, while older adults showed larger mixing costs than younger adults when using two languages in the dual-language environment relative to the single-language environment, they surprisingly showed smaller mixing costs than younger adults in the noun-verb within-language naming task. These findings show that language control, and the way it differs between older and younger adults, is not the same across within- and bilingual-language competition.

摘要

在语言产生过程中,单词检索随着年龄的增长而减慢。然而,双语者也需要语言控制来管理语言竞争,特别是在根据提示切换语言时。本研究考察了这种双语语言控制在年轻和老年成年人之间的差异。它还比较了双语控制以及年龄组差异与在一种语言内交替响应时可能应用的控制。在实验 1 中,40 名年轻和 40 名年长的单语成年人完成了一项任务,该任务在图片的名词和动词之间交替反应。该任务显示了与语言控制相关的成本,但这些成本在年龄组之间没有差异。实验 2 由 50 名年长和 50 名年轻的双语成年人完成。与在单语环境中相比,当在双语环境中切换语言时,年长的成年人比年轻的成年人表现出更大的转换成本,这表明他们在反应性控制方面遇到了更大的困难。然而,尽管与在单语环境中相比,年长的成年人在双语环境中使用两种语言时表现出更大的混合成本,但他们在名词-动词内的单语命名任务中表现出的混合成本比年轻的成年人小。这些发现表明,语言控制以及它在年轻和年长成年人之间的差异,在双语和单语竞争之间并不相同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f843/10555994/dbf48357ff33/41598_2023_43886_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f843/10555994/dbf48357ff33/41598_2023_43886_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f843/10555994/dbf48357ff33/41598_2023_43886_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparison of language control while switching within versus between languages in younger and older adults.年轻人和老年人在语言转换时内部和之间的语言控制比较。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 5;13(1):16740. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43886-1.
2
Examining bilingual language switching across the lifespan in cued and voluntary switching contexts.在提示性和自主性转换情境中研究双语者一生中的语言转换情况。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Aug;46(8):759-788. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000746. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
3
Dual-tasking while using two languages: Examining the cognitive resource demands of cued and voluntary language production in bilinguals.双语者的双任务处理:考察双语者的提示语言产生和自由语言产生的认知资源需求。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Mar;77(3):461-477. doi: 10.1177/17470218231173638. Epub 2023 May 18.
4
Within-language lexical interference can be resolved in a similar way to between-language interference.同语内词汇干扰一样,语言间词汇干扰也可以得到解决。
Cognition. 2021 Sep;214:104760. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104760. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
5
Should I stay or should I switch? A cost-benefit analysis of voluntary language switching in young and aging bilinguals.我该留下还是该切换?年轻和老年双语者中自愿语言切换的成本效益分析。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 May;35(3):640-65. doi: 10.1037/a0014981.
6
Age-related effect on language control and executive control in bilingual and monolingual speakers: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.年龄对双语和单语使用者语言控制和执行控制的影响:行为和电生理证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 17;138:107336. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107336. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
7
Bilingual switching between languages and listeners: Insights from immersive virtual reality.语言与听众之间的双语切换:来自沉浸式虚拟现实的见解。
Cognition. 2020 Feb;195:104107. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104107. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
8
Modulation of language switching by cue timing: Implications for models of bilingual language control.线索时机对语言切换的调节作用:对双语语言控制模型的启示
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Aug;43(8):1239-1253. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000382. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
9
The effect of childhood bilingualism on episodic and semantic memory tasks.童年双语经历对情景记忆和语义记忆任务的影响。
Scand J Psychol. 2008 Apr;49(2):93-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00633.x.
10
Task switching and bilingualism in young and older adults: A behavioral and electrophysiological investigation.任务转换和年轻及老年成年人的双语能力:一项行为和电生理研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Oct;133:107186. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107186. Epub 2019 Sep 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Inhibitory control of the dominant language: Reversed language dominance is the tip of the iceberg.主导语言的抑制控制:语言优势逆转只是冰山一角。
J Mem Lang. 2023 Jun;130. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2023.104410. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
2
Within-language lexical interference can be resolved in a similar way to between-language interference.同语内词汇干扰一样,语言间词汇干扰也可以得到解决。
Cognition. 2021 Sep;214:104760. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104760. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
3
How attention controls naming: Lessons from Wundt 2.0.注意力如何控制命名:温特 2.0 的启示。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Oct;150(10):1927-1955. doi: 10.1037/xge0001030. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
4
Examining bilingual language switching across the lifespan in cued and voluntary switching contexts.在提示性和自主性转换情境中研究双语者一生中的语言转换情况。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Aug;46(8):759-788. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000746. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
5
Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial.混合效应模型中的功效分析与效应量:教程
J Cogn. 2018 Jan 12;1(1):9. doi: 10.5334/joc.10.
6
What about proactive language control?那么主动语言控制呢?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Feb;27(1):24-35. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01654-1.
7
Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder.潜伏在我们中间的大猩猩:一个在线行为实验构建器。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Feb;52(1):388-407. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x.
8
Poor coherence in older people's speech is explained by impaired semantic and executive processes.老年人言语连贯性差可归因于语义和执行过程受损。
Elife. 2018 Sep 4;7:e38907. doi: 10.7554/eLife.38907.
9
MultiPic: A standardized set of 750 drawings with norms for six European languages.多图:一套标准化的750幅图画,并附有六种欧洲语言的规范。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Apr;71(4):808-816. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1310261. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
10
Does Bilingual Language Control Decline in Older Age?老年双语语言控制能力会下降吗?
Linguist Approaches Biling. 2016;6(1-2):86-118. doi: 10.1075/lab.15003.iva. Epub 2016 Feb 19.