Lemey Philippe, Van Dooren Sonia, Vandamme Anne-Mieke
Rega Institute for Medical Research, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Apr;22(4):942-51. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi078. Epub 2005 Jan 5.
To test hypotheses on the differences in retroviral genetic diversity, we compared the evolutionary dynamics of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) group M and the primate T-cell lymphotropic virus (PTLV) using a full-genome analysis. Evolutionary rates and nonsynonymous/synonymous substitution rate ratios were estimated across the genome using a maximum likelihood sliding window approach, and molecular clock properties were investigated. We confirm a remarkable difference in genetic stability and selective pressure at the interhost level. While there is evidence for adaptive evolution in HIV-1, the evolution of PTLV is almost exclusively characterized by negative selection or nearly neutral processes. For both retroviruses, evolutionary rate estimates across the genome reflect the differential selective constraints. However, based on the relationship between evolutionary rate and selective pressure and based on the comparison of synonymous substitution rates, the differences in rate between HIV-1 and PTLV cannot be explained by selective forces only. Several evolutionary and statistical assumptions, examined using a Bayesian coalescent method, were shown to have little influence on our inference.
为了检验关于逆转录病毒遗传多样性差异的假设,我们使用全基因组分析比较了1型人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV-1)M组和灵长类T细胞嗜淋巴病毒(PTLV)的进化动态。使用最大似然滑动窗口方法估计全基因组的进化速率和非同义/同义替换率比,并研究分子钟特性。我们证实了宿主间水平上遗传稳定性和选择压力存在显著差异。虽然有证据表明HIV-1存在适应性进化,但PTLV的进化几乎完全以负选择或近中性过程为特征。对于这两种逆转录病毒,全基因组的进化速率估计反映了不同的选择限制。然而,基于进化速率与选择压力之间的关系以及同义替换率的比较,HIV-1和PTLV之间的速率差异不能仅由选择力来解释。使用贝叶斯合并方法检验的几个进化和统计假设对我们的推断影响很小。