Amato Maria Pia, Grimaud Jerome, Achiti Iuliana, Bartolozzi Maria Letizia, Adeleine Patrice, Hartung Hans-Peter, Kappos Ludwig, Thompson Alan, Trojano Maria, Vukusic Sandra, Confavreux Christian
Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni, 85, 50134, Florence, Italy.
J Neurol. 2004 Dec;251(12):1472-80. doi: 10.1007/s00415-004-0567-0.
The EDMUS system is a clinical database specifically tailored to the description of multiple sclerosis (MS). The EVALUED (Evaluation of the EDMUS system) study is an European project with two objectives: 1) to assess the inter-examiner reliability of the whole EDMUS system; 2) to validate the EDMUS-Grading Scale (EGS),which is a simplified version of the Kurtzke Disability Status Scale (DSS).
The protocol included 12 neurologists working in pairs within six European centres (Bari, Basel, Florence, London, Lyon, Würzburg). They assessed independently 30 MS patients in their centre, filling in the EDMUS forms. The reliability of the system was assessed on selected key items in the history of the MS onset, the clinical course and the disease course classification. The clinical examination of the patients permitted an assessment of the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and the EGS. Level of agreement was measured in terms of kappa and weighted kappa indexes whenever appropriate.
The study included 180 patients with definite or probable MS of whom 37% were males. Age was 35.8+/-9.6 years (mean +/- SD), disease duration 7.8+/-5.7 years, and mean EDSS score 4.1+/-2.2. The disease course was relapsing-remitting in 67%, secondary progressive in 22%, and progressive from disease onset in 11%. For key items of the history, the inter-examiner reliability level ranged from moderate to excellent. Concerning the disability scales, perfect agreement was reached in 59 % for EDSS and 78% for EGS. The close correlation and linear association (r=0.94, p<0.0001) between both scales demonstrated EGS's construct validity.
The EDMUS system allows a consistent clinical description of MS using a common language. This standardized follow-up of MS patients is valuable especially in studies requiring a critical mass of informative patients.
EDMUS系统是一个专门为描述多发性硬化症(MS)而定制的临床数据库。EDMUS评估(EDMUS系统评估)研究是一个欧洲项目,有两个目标:1)评估整个EDMUS系统的检查者间可靠性;2)验证EDMUS分级量表(EGS),它是Kurtzke残疾状态量表(DSS)的简化版本。
该方案包括12名神经科医生,他们在六个欧洲中心(巴里、巴塞尔、佛罗伦萨、伦敦、里昂、维尔茨堡)两两合作。他们在各自中心独立评估30例MS患者,填写EDMUS表格。在MS发病史、临床病程和疾病病程分类的选定关键项目上评估系统的可靠性。对患者的临床检查允许评估Kurtzke扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)和EGS。在适当的时候,用kappa和加权kappa指数来衡量一致性水平。
该研究纳入了180例确诊或可能患有MS的患者,其中37%为男性。年龄为35.8±9.6岁(均值±标准差),病程为病程病程为7.8±5.7年,平均EDSS评分为4.1±2.2。疾病病程为复发缓解型的占67%,继发进展型的占22%,发病即进展型的占11%。对于病史的关键项目,检查者间可靠性水平从中度到优秀不等。关于残疾量表,EDSS的一致性为59%,EGS的一致性为78%。两个量表之间的密切相关性和线性关联(r = )表明了EGS的结构效度。
EDMUS系统允许使用共同语言对MS进行一致的临床描述。这种对MS患者的标准化随访尤其在需要大量信息丰富患者的研究中很有价值。 (注:原文中“r = 0.94, p<0.0001”后面的内容缺失)