Rubin M, Hewstone M
School of Psychology, University of Wales, Cardiff.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1998;2(1):40-62. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0201_3.
Distinctions are made between global and specific, personal and social, and trait and state self-esteem, and these are used to structure a review of over 40 studies concerning social identity theory's hypothesis that (a) intergroup discrimination elevates self-esteem and (b) low self-esteem motivates discrimination. It is observed that researchers have tended to employ measures of global personal trait self-esteem in their investigations of this self-esteem hypothesis, and it is argued that measures of specific social state self-esteem are more consistent with social identity theory's assumptions. Although no convincing evidence is found for the self-esteem hypothesis in its full and unqualified form, it is argued that this is due to a lack of specificity in its formulation and it is suggested that a more qualified and specific version of the hypothesis may be more appropriate.
人们区分了总体自尊和特定自尊、个人自尊和社会自尊,以及特质自尊和状态自尊,并用这些区分来构建对40多项研究的综述,这些研究涉及社会认同理论的假设:(a)群体间歧视会提升自尊,以及(b)低自尊会引发歧视。研究发现,在对这一自尊假设的调查中,研究人员倾向于采用总体个人特质自尊的测量方法,有人认为特定社会状态自尊的测量方法更符合社会认同理论的假设。尽管没有找到充分且无保留形式的自尊假设的令人信服的证据,但有人认为这是由于其表述缺乏特异性,建议该假设更具限定性和特异性的版本可能更合适。