• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体间互惠规范:规范认同模型。

The Norm of Reciprocity in Intergroup Context: A Normative-Identity Model.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Dokuz Eylül University, Konak, Türkiye.

出版信息

Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Mar;58(1):338-360. doi: 10.1007/s12124-023-09760-5. Epub 2023 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1007/s12124-023-09760-5
PMID:36988861
Abstract

Reciprocity, regarded as a fundamental psychological phenomenon, may underlie a wide range of interpersonal and intergroup behaviors. Various disciplines such as behavioral economics, anthropology, sociology, and psychology as well documented how reciprocity is a strong determinant of human behavior. On the other hand, less is known about intergroup reciprocity, its functions and consequences as well as the psychological mechanisms through which these effects manifest, remain mostly unknown. In this paper, we propose a model to understand how the reciprocity norm operates in the intergroup contexts, through employing the Personal Norm of Reciprocity model (Perugini et al., 2003) and the Self-Categorization Theory (Turner et al., 1987). We suggest that the conditions that give rise to intergroup reciprocal behavior are ingroup identification, labeling outgroup behavior as a favor or transgression, and the internalization of the reciprocity norm. We also propose that the intergroup outcomes, such as ingroup favoritism, discrimination, collective action, and conflict resolution, might become more understandable when taking into account the reciprocity as an explanatory variable.

摘要

互惠被视为一种基本的心理现象,可能是广泛的人际和群体间行为的基础。行为经济学、人类学、社会学和心理学等诸多学科都有记载,表明互惠是人类行为的一个强有力的决定因素。另一方面,人们对群体间互惠、其功能和后果以及这些影响表现出来的心理机制知之甚少。在本文中,我们通过采用互惠规范个人模型(Perugini 等人,2003)和自我分类理论(Turner 等人,1987),提出了一个理解互惠规范在群体间情境中运作的模型。我们认为,导致群体间互惠行为的条件是内群体认同、将群体行为标记为恩惠或侵犯,以及互惠规范的内化。我们还提出,当将互惠作为一个解释变量时,群体间的结果,如内群体偏袒、歧视、集体行动和冲突解决,可能会变得更加容易理解。

相似文献

1
The Norm of Reciprocity in Intergroup Context: A Normative-Identity Model.群体间互惠规范:规范认同模型。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Mar;58(1):338-360. doi: 10.1007/s12124-023-09760-5. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
2
Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis.内群体偏好合作:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1556-81. doi: 10.1037/a0037737. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
3
Ingroup favoritism and intergroup cooperation under indirect reciprocity based on group reputation.基于群体声誉的间接互惠中的内群体偏好和群体间合作。
J Theor Biol. 2012 Oct 21;311:8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Jul 14.
4
Groupwise information sharing promotes ingroup favoritism in indirect reciprocity.群体间信息共享促进间接互惠中的内群体偏爱。
BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Nov 5;12:213. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-213.
5
Do unto others as they do unto you: reciprocity and social identification as determinants of ingroup favoritism.以其人之道还治其人之身:互惠与社会认同作为内群体偏袒的决定因素。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Jun;31(6):831-45. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271659.
6
Group norms, intergroup resource allocation, and social reasoning among children and adolescents.儿童和青少年的群体规范、群体间资源分配和社会推理。
Dev Psychol. 2017 Dec;53(12):2333-2339. doi: 10.1037/dev0000392. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
7
When does activating diversity alleviate, when does it increase intergroup bias? An ingroup projection perspective.激活多样性何时会减轻、何时会增加群体间偏见?一种内群体投射视角。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 5;12(6):e0178738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178738. eCollection 2017.
8
Can intergroup behaviors be emitted out of self-determined reasons? Testing the role of group norms and behavioral congruence in the internalization of discrimination and parity behaviors.群体间行为可以出于自主决定的原因而产生吗?检验群体规范和行为一致性在歧视和均等行为内化中的作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Jan;38(1):63-76. doi: 10.1177/0146167211429804. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
9
Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: categorization, reciprocation, or fear?最小群体范式中的组间歧视:分类、互惠还是恐惧?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Jul;79(1):77-94. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.1.77.
10
Rejecting ingroup loyalty for the truth: Children's and adolescents' evaluations of deviant peers within a misinformation intergroup context.为了追求真理而摒弃群体忠诚:儿童和青少年在错误信息群体背景下对偏离群体同伴的评价
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Jul;243:105923. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105923. Epub 2024 Apr 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Toward a Comprehensive Understanding of Intergroup Contact: Descriptions and Mediators of Positive and Negative Contact Among Majority and Minority Groups.迈向群体间接触的全面理解:多数群体和少数群体之间积极和消极接触的描述和中介。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Mar;43(3):347-364. doi: 10.1177/0146167216685291.
2
Any of them will do: In-group identification, out-group entitativity, and gang membership as predictors of group-based retribution.其中任何一个都可以:内群体认同、外群体实体性以及作为基于群体报复预测因素的帮派成员身份。
Aggress Behav. 2015 May;41(3):242-52. doi: 10.1002/ab.21581.
3
Five Misunderstandings About Cultural Evolution.
关于文化进化的五个误解。
Hum Nat. 2008 Jun;19(2):119-37. doi: 10.1007/s12110-008-9037-1. Epub 2008 Apr 19.
4
Mortality salience increases personal relevance of the norm of reciprocity.死亡凸显会增加互惠规范的个人相关性。
Psychol Rep. 2012 Oct;111(2):565-74. doi: 10.2466/20.02.21.PR0.111.5.565-574.
5
Emerging signs of strong reciprocity in human ontogeny.人类个体发育中强烈互惠行为的新迹象。
Front Psychol. 2011 Dec 19;2:353. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00353. eCollection 2011.
6
Fundamental(ist) attribution error: Protestants are dispositionally focused.基本归因错误:新教徒更注重性格。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Feb;102(2):281-90. doi: 10.1037/a0026294. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
7
The roles of ingroup identification and outgroup entitativity in intergroup retribution.内群体认同和外群体实体性在群体间报复中的作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Nov;34(11):1570-82. doi: 10.1177/0146167208322999. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
8
Vicarious retribution: the role of collective blame in intergroup aggression.替代性报复:集体指责在群体间攻击行为中的作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(4):372-90. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_6.
9
Complementarity theory: why human social capacities evolved to require cultural complements.互补性理论:为何人类社会能力的进化需要文化互补。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2000;4(1):76-94. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_7.
10
Social identity theory's self-esteem hypothesis: a review and some suggestions for clarification.社会认同理论的自尊假设:综述与若干澄清建议
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1998;2(1):40-62. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0201_3.