Goldhahn Sabine, Audigé Laurent, Helfet David L, Hanson Beate
AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation, AO Center, Stettbachstrasse 10, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Int Orthop. 2005 Feb;29(1):59-64. doi: 10.1007/s00264-004-0617-3. Epub 2005 Jan 13.
The aim of this study was to gain information about how orthopaedic surgeons use evidence-based literature and how this is influenced by their knowledge of evidence-based medicine. We administered a questionnaire to participants at courses of the Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO-ASIF) in Davos, Switzerland, in December 2003. Special attention was paid to the surgeons' educational level, affiliations, and the infrastructure and evidence sources they used. In addition, we tested participants on their knowledge and attitude to evidence-based orthopaedic surgery (EBOS). Of 1,274 course participants, 456 completed the questionnaire. Of 446 respondents, 300 had heard of EBOS, but only 45% could define it correctly. Nearly two thirds identified scientific publications as their main source of scientific knowledge. The respondents' attitudes to and awareness of EBOS principles was high, but it did not influence their manner of searching for scientific information or their trust in various sources of recommendations.
本研究的目的是获取有关骨科医生如何使用循证医学文献以及这如何受到他们循证医学知识影响的信息。2003年12月,我们在瑞士达沃斯的内固定研究协会(AO - ASIF)课程上向参与者发放了一份问卷。特别关注了外科医生的教育水平、所属机构以及他们使用的基础设施和证据来源。此外,我们对参与者的循证骨外科手术(EBOS)知识和态度进行了测试。在1274名课程参与者中,456人完成了问卷。在446名受访者中,300人听说过EBOS,但只有45%能够正确定义它。近三分之二的人将科学出版物视为他们科学知识的主要来源。受访者对EBOS原则的态度和认识程度较高,但这并未影响他们搜索科学信息的方式或他们对各种推荐来源的信任。