Wargocki Pawel, Wyon David P, Fanger P Ole
International Centre for Indoor Environment and Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Indoor Air. 2004;14 Suppl 8:7-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00304.x.
A 2 x 2 replicated field intervention experiment was conducted in a call-center providing a telephone directory service: outdoor air supply rate was adjusted to be 8% or 80% of the total airflow of 430 l/s (3.5 /h) and the supply air filters were either new or had been in place for 6 months. One of these independent variables was changed each week for 8 weeks. The interventions did not affect room temperature, relative humidity or noise level. The 26 operators were blind to conditions and each week returned questionnaires recording their environmental perceptions and Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) symptoms. Their performance was continuously monitored by recording the average talk-time every 30 min. Replacing a used filter with a clean filter reduced talk-time by about 10% at the high ventilation rate but had no significant effect at the low rate. Increasing the outdoor air supply rate reduced talk-time by 6% with a new filter in place but increased talk-time by 8% with a used filter in place. The interventions also had significant effects on some SBS symptoms and environmental perceptions. The present results indicate that increasing outdoor air supply rate and replacing filters can have positive effects on health, comfort and performance.
Supply air filters should be changed frequently not just because their airflow resistance increases progressively but because they degrade air quality with negative consequences for health, comfort and the performance of office work, all of which are factors that affect office productivity (profitability). Increasing outdoor air supply rates may only be beneficial when new filters are installed. Unwanted negative effects may be produced when used filters are in place. Filter condition (used or new) should always be recorded to make it possible to draw sound conclusions in studies of the effects of outdoor air supply rates on building occupants.
在一个提供电话簿服务的呼叫中心进行了一项2×2重复的现场干预实验:将室外空气供应率调整为430升/秒(3.5次/小时)总气流的8%或80%,供应空气过滤器要么是新的,要么已使用6个月。这两个自变量每周改变一个,持续8周。这些干预措施未影响室温、相对湿度或噪音水平。26名操作员对实验条件不知情,每周返回记录其环境感知和病态建筑综合症(SBS)症状的问卷。通过每30分钟记录一次平均通话时间来持续监测他们的表现。在高通风率下,用清洁过滤器替换用过的过滤器可使通话时间减少约10%,但在低通风率下无显著影响。在安装新过滤器时,提高室外空气供应率可使通话时间减少6%,但在安装用过的过滤器时,通话时间增加8%。这些干预措施对一些SBS症状和环境感知也有显著影响。目前的结果表明,提高室外空气供应率和更换过滤器对健康、舒适度和工作表现可能有积极影响。
供应空气过滤器应经常更换,不仅因为其气流阻力会逐渐增加,还因为它们会降低空气质量,对健康、舒适度和办公室工作表现产生负面影响,而这些都是影响办公室生产力(盈利能力)的因素。仅在安装新过滤器时提高室外空气供应率可能才有益。当使用过的过滤器在位时可能会产生不良负面影响。应始终记录过滤器状况(用过的或新的),以便在研究室外空气供应率对建筑 occupants 的影响时能够得出可靠结论。