Cao Jiamin, Zhang Feng, Zhu Ziyi, Xiong Wei
Department of Ophthalmology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha City, Hunan Province, China.
Digit Health. 2025 Jul 29;11:20552076251365086. doi: 10.1177/20552076251365086. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
Short videos are increasingly being used to disseminate health information. However, the quality of videos on common ophthalmic conditions such as cataract has not been systematically evaluated.
This study employed a cross-sectional design. The TikTok platform was searched using the term "cataract" from 20:00 to 24:00 on 8 November 2024, without any restrictions. The top 100 retrieved videos were included in the study. They were rated using The () benchmark criteria, Global Quality Score (GQS) scale, modified Decision-making Information Support Criteria for Evaluating the Reliability of Non-randomised Studies score, and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audio Visual Content. Videos by different groups were compared for quality and their underlying factors.
The top 100 videos had an average of 2009.1 likes, 795.65 comments, 2628.91 shares, and 554.08 saves. Their benchmark criteria, GQS, the modified Decision-making Information Support Criteria for Evaluating the Reliability of Non-randomised Studies score, and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audio Visual Content score ratings differed ( < .05) with account ownership, doctor rank, and video content. More videos were uploaded by institutions and physicians than by nonphysicians ( < .05). The number of likes, comments, favorites, and shares of videos was not correlated with quality (Spearman correlation; > .05). Further regression analysis confirmed that video quality can be predicted using account ownership.
The quality of cataract-related short videos on platforms has room for improvement. Users may estimate video quality based on the identity of the content creator.
短视频越来越多地被用于传播健康信息。然而,关于白内障等常见眼科疾病的视频质量尚未得到系统评估。
本研究采用横断面设计。于2024年11月8日20:00至24:00在TikTok平台上搜索“白内障”一词,无任何限制。检索到的前100个视频纳入研究。使用()基准标准、全球质量评分(GQS)量表、评估非随机研究可靠性的改良决策信息支持标准评分以及视听内容患者教育材料评估工具对它们进行评分。比较不同组视频的质量及其潜在因素。
前100个视频平均有2009.1个赞、795.65条评论、2628.91次分享和554.08次保存。它们的基准标准、GQS、评估非随机研究可靠性的改良决策信息支持标准评分以及视听内容患者教育材料评估工具评分在账户所有权、医生级别和视频内容方面存在差异(<0.05)。机构和医生上传的视频比非医生上传的更多(<0.05)。视频的点赞、评论、收藏和分享数量与质量无关(斯皮尔曼相关性;>0.05)。进一步的回归分析证实,可以使用账户所有权来预测视频质量。
平台上与白内障相关的短视频质量有提升空间。用户可以根据内容创作者的身份来估计视频质量。