Suppr超能文献

用于抗精神病药物所致迟发性运动障碍的抗胆碱能药物。

Anticholinergic medication for antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia.

作者信息

Bergman Hanna, Soares-Weiser Karla

机构信息

Cochrane Response, Cochrane, St Albans House, 57-59 Haymarket, London, UK, SW1Y 4QX.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 17;1(1):CD000204. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000204.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic (neuroleptic) medication is used extensively to treat people with serious mental illnesses. However, it is associated with a wide range of adverse effects, including movement disorders. Because of this, many people treated with antipsychotic medication also receive anticholinergic drugs in order to reduce some of the associated movement side-effects. However, there is also a suggestion from animal experiments that the chronic administration of anticholinergics could cause tardive dyskinesia.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the use or the withdrawal of anticholinergic drugs (benzhexol, benztropine, biperiden, orphenadrine, procyclidine, scopolamine, or trihexylphenidyl) are clinically effective for the treatment of people with both antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia and schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses.

SEARCH METHODS

We retrieved 712 references from searching the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials including the registries of clinical trials (16 July 2015 and 26 April 2017). We also inspected references of all identified studies for further trials and contacted authors of trials for additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included reports identified in the search if they were controlled trials dealing with people with antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia and schizophrenia or other chronic mental illness who had been randomly allocated to (a) anticholinergic medication versus placebo (or no intervention), (b) anticholinergic medication versus any other intervention for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia, or (c) withdrawal of anticholinergic medication versus continuation of anticholinergic medication.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We independently extracted data from included trials and we estimated risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assumed that people who left early had no improvement. We assessed risk of bias and created a 'Summary of findings' table using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

The previous version of this review included no trials. We identified two trials that could be included from the 2015 and 2017 searches. They randomised 30 in- and outpatients with schizophrenia in the USA and Germany. Overall, the risk of bias was unclear, mainly due to poor reporting: allocation concealment was not described; generation of the sequence was not explicit; studies were not clearly blinded; and outcome data were not fully reported.Findings were sparse. One study reported on the primary outcomes and found that significantly more participants allocated to procyclidine (anticholinergic) had not improved to a clinically important extent compared with those allocated to isocarboxazid (MAO-inhibitor) after 40 weeks' treatment (1 RCT, n = 20; RR 4.20, 95% CI 1.40 to 12.58; very low quality evidence); that there was no evidence of a difference in the incidence of any adverse effects (1 RCT, n = 20; RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.02 to 7.32; very low quality evidence); or acceptability of treatment (measured by participants leaving the study early) (1 RCT, n = 20; RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.02 to 7.32; very low quality evidence). The other trial compared anticholinergic withdrawal with anticholinergic continuation and found no evidence of a difference in the incidence of acceptability of treatment (measured by participants leaving the study early) (1 RCT, n = 10; RR 2.14, 95% CI 0.11 to 42.52; very low quality evidence).No trials reported on social confidence, social inclusion, social networks, or personalised quality of life - outcomes designated important to patients. No studies comparing either i. anticholinergics with placebo or no treatment, or ii. studies of anticholinergic withdrawal, were found that reported on the primary outcome 'no clinically important improvement in TD symptoms and adverse events'.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on currently available evidence, no confident statement can be made about the effectiveness of anticholinergics to treat people with antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia. The same applies for the withdrawal of such medications. Whether the withdrawal of anticholinergics may benefit people with antipsychotic-induced TD should be evaluated in a parallel-group, placebo-controlled randomised trial, with adequate sample size and at least 6 weeks of follow-up.

摘要

背景

抗精神病药物(神经阻滞剂)被广泛用于治疗严重精神疾病患者。然而,它与多种不良反应相关,包括运动障碍。因此,许多接受抗精神病药物治疗的人也会使用抗胆碱能药物,以减少一些相关的运动副作用。然而,动物实验也表明,长期使用抗胆碱能药物可能会导致迟发性运动障碍。

目的

确定使用或停用抗胆碱能药物(苯海索、苄托品、比哌立登、奥芬那君、丙环定、东莨菪碱或三己芬迪)对同时患有抗精神病药物所致迟发性运动障碍和精神分裂症或其他慢性精神疾病的患者是否具有临床疗效。

检索方法

我们通过检索Cochrane精神分裂症研究组基于研究的试验注册库(包括临床试验注册库,检索时间为2015年7月16日和2017年4月26日),共检索到712篇参考文献。我们还查阅了所有已识别研究的参考文献,以寻找更多试验,并与试验作者联系以获取更多信息。

选择标准

如果检索到的报告是关于抗精神病药物所致迟发性运动障碍和精神分裂症或其他慢性精神疾病患者的对照试验,且这些患者被随机分配到以下情况,我们将纳入研究:(a)抗胆碱能药物与安慰剂(或无干预)对比;(b)抗胆碱能药物与治疗迟发性运动障碍的任何其他干预措施对比;(c)停用抗胆碱能药物与继续使用抗胆碱能药物对比。

数据收集与分析

我们独立从纳入的试验中提取数据,并估计风险比(RR)及95%置信区间(CI)。我们假设提前退出的患者无改善。我们评估了偏倚风险,并使用GRADE方法创建了“结果总结”表。

主要结果

本综述的上一版本未纳入任何试验。通过2015年和2017年的检索,我们识别出两项可纳入的试验。这两项试验在美国和德国对30名精神分裂症住院和门诊患者进行了随机分组。总体而言,偏倚风险尚不清楚,主要原因是报告质量较差:未描述分配隐藏;序列生成不明确;研究未明确设盲;结局数据未充分报告。研究结果较少。一项研究报告了主要结局,发现与分配到异卡波肼(单胺氧化酶抑制剂)的患者相比,分配到丙环定(抗胆碱能药物)的患者在治疗40周后,在临床上未得到显著改善的比例更高(1项随机对照试验,n = 20;RR 4.20,95% CI 1.40至12.58;极低质量证据);没有证据表明在任何不良反应的发生率上存在差异(1项随机对照试验,n = 20;RR 0.33,95% CI 0.02至7.32;极低质量证据);或治疗的可接受性(通过提前退出研究的患者来衡量)方面存在差异(1项随机对照试验,n = 20;RR 0.33,95% CI 0.02至7.32;极低质量证据)。另一项试验对比了停用抗胆碱能药物与继续使用抗胆碱能药物的情况,未发现治疗可接受性的发生率(通过提前退出研究的患者来衡量)存在差异(1项随机对照试验,n = 10;RR 2.14,9% CI 0.11至42.52;极低质量证据)。没有试验报告社交信心、社会融入、社交网络或个性化生活质量等对患者来说很重要的结局。未发现任何比较以下情况的研究:i. 抗胆碱能药物与安慰剂或不治疗;ii. 抗胆碱能药物撤药研究,且报告了主要结局“迟发性运动障碍症状和不良事件无临床重要改善”。

作者结论

基于目前可得的证据,无法就抗胆碱能药物治疗抗精神病药物所致迟发性运动障碍患者的有效性做出可靠结论。对于停用此类药物的情况也是如此。抗胆碱能药物撤药是否可能使抗精神病药物所致迟发性运动障碍患者获益,应在一项平行组、安慰剂对照的随机试验中进行评估,该试验要有足够的样本量且至少随访6周。

相似文献

9
Vitamin E for antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia.维生素E用于抗精神病药物所致迟发性运动障碍
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 17;1(1):CD000209. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000209.pub3.
10
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.

引用本文的文献

2
Tardive Syndromes: A Challenging Multitude of Maladies.迟发性综合征:一类具有挑战性的多种病症
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2025 Mar 1;28(2):169-177. doi: 10.4103/aian.aian_657_24. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
3
Guideline for pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia 2022.《2022年精神分裂症药物治疗指南》
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2025 Mar;45(1):e12497. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12497. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
9
SOP: acute hyperkinetic movement disorders.标准操作规程:急性运动过度性运动障碍
Neurol Res Pract. 2023 Jul 27;5(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s42466-023-00260-w.

本文引用的文献

6
Vitamin E for neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia.维生素E治疗抗精神病药所致迟发性运动障碍
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16(2):CD000209. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000209.pub2.
7
Tardive dyskinesia and new antipsychotics.迟发性运动障碍与新型抗精神病药物
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2008 Mar;21(2):151-6. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3282f53132.
9

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验