Sran Meena M, Khan Karim M
Osteoporosis Program, Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Man Ther. 2005 Feb;10(1):21-7. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2004.06.003.
Physiotherapists typically use a variety of modes to treat their clients, including manual therapy. The literature cautions against the use of manual therapy in individuals with osteoporosis, (Musculoskeletal Manipulation: Evaluation of the Scientific Evidence, Charles C Thomas Publisher, Springfield, IL; Common Vertebral Joint Problems, 2nd Edition, Churchill Livingstone, New York; Maitland's Vertebral Manipulation, 6th Edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston; Br. J. Sports Med. 37 (2003) 195-196) yet clinical experience (Br. J. Sports Med. 37 (2003) 195-196) and published cases (J. Manip. Physiol. Ther. 15(7) (1992) 450-454) suggest that these techniques are still being used by at least some clinicians. The purpose of this study was to measure the most common treatment modes used by a random sample of physiotherapists practicing in the province of British Columbia (BC) in the treatment of individuals with osteoporosis. To assess whether physiotherapists in BC have concerns about the use of manual therapy in individuals with osteoporosis, particularly whether physiotherapists have concerns about fracture as a complication of treatment. This cross-sectional study of 171 physiotherapists in BC used a questionnaire developed by the physiotherapist in the Osteoporosis Program at the BC Women's Health Centre (a part of the Children's & Women's Health Centre of BC). The response rate (67/171) was 39%. Ninety-seven per cent of respondents reported using strength exercises and postural reeducation, while 45% reported using manual therapy in this population. Ninety-one per cent of respondents reported having concerns about the use of manual therapy. Vertebral fracture and rib fracture were the most commonly reported concerns. These findings suggest that most physiotherapists practicing in BC, Canada use evidence-based methods (i.e. strength training) when treating individuals with osteoporosis, a large number use manual therapy, and most have concerns about its use. Physiotherapists are most concerned about fractures, in particular vertebral fracture, but injury to other musculoskeletal tissues is also of concern. Studies of safety and effectiveness of manual therapy in this population are needed to guide clinical practice.
物理治疗师通常使用多种方式来治疗他们的客户,包括手法治疗。文献警示不要对骨质疏松症患者使用手法治疗(《肌肉骨骼手法治疗:科学证据评估》,查尔斯·C·托马斯出版社,伊利诺伊州斯普林菲尔德;《常见椎体关节问题》,第2版,丘吉尔·利文斯通出版社,纽约;《梅特兰椎体手法治疗》,第6版,巴特沃思-海涅曼出版社,波士顿;《英国运动医学杂志》37 (2003) 195 - 196),然而临床经验(《英国运动医学杂志》37 (2003) 195 - 196)和已发表的病例(《手法治疗与生理治疗杂志》15(7) (1992) 450 - 454)表明,至少一些临床医生仍在使用这些技术。本研究的目的是测量在不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)执业的物理治疗师随机样本在治疗骨质疏松症患者时使用的最常见治疗方式。评估BC省的物理治疗师是否担心对骨质疏松症患者使用手法治疗,特别是物理治疗师是否担心骨折作为治疗的并发症。这项对BC省171名物理治疗师的横断面研究使用了由BC省妇女健康中心(BC省儿童与妇女健康中心的一部分)骨质疏松项目的物理治疗师编制的问卷。回复率(67/171)为39%。97%的受访者报告使用力量训练和姿势再教育,而45%的受访者报告在该人群中使用手法治疗。91%的受访者报告担心使用手法治疗。椎体骨折和肋骨骨折是最常报告的担忧。这些发现表明,在加拿大BC省执业的大多数物理治疗师在治疗骨质疏松症患者时使用基于证据的方法(即力量训练),大量治疗师使用手法治疗,并且大多数人对其使用表示担忧。物理治疗师最担心骨折,特别是椎体骨折,但对其他肌肉骨骼组织的损伤也很关注。需要对该人群中手法治疗的安全性和有效性进行研究以指导临床实践。