Lewin Terry J, Slade Tim, Andrews Gavin, Carr Vaughan J, Hornabrook Charles W
Hunter Mental Health and the Centre for Mental Health Studies, University of Newcastle, Callaghan (NSW) 2308, Australia.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2005 Feb;40(2):87-98. doi: 10.1007/s00127-005-0878-1.
The lack of established brief Personality Disorder (PD) screening instruments may account for the absence of PD data from previous national mental health surveys. This paper documents the measurement of PD in a large Australian survey, with a particular focus on the characteristics of the screening instrument and the consequences of its mode of administration and scoring.
PD was assessed in the 1997 Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing (N=10,641 adults) using the 59-item version of the International Personality Disorder Examination Questionnaire (IPDEQ), which was administered in a computerised format by trained non-clinical interviewers.
Normative profiles are reported for three IPDEQ scoring schemes (simple categorical, IPDEQ(S); ICD-10 criterion based categorical, IPDEQ(C); and dimensional scoring, IPDEQ(D)), together with an examination of the IPDEQ's psychometric properties and associations with Axis I comorbidity, disability, and selected psychosocial characteristics. The overall rate of ICD-10 PD in Australia was estimated to be 6.5%, although the categorical assessment of dissocial PD clearly provided an underestimate. PD was associated with younger age, poorer functioning, and a sevenfold increase in the number of comorbid Axis I disorders during the preceding 12 months.
While the methods used to assess PD in the national survey were constrained by project demands, the overall performance of the IPDEQ was considered satisfactory, based on data from a range of sources. In particular, although IPDEQ item and subscale revisions are recommended, evidence is presented suggesting that aggregate IPDEQ dimensional scores should provide useful self-report indices of the overall likelihood of PD.
缺乏公认的简短人格障碍(PD)筛查工具可能是以往国家心理健康调查中没有PD数据的原因。本文记录了在一项大型澳大利亚调查中对PD的测量,特别关注筛查工具的特点及其施测方式和评分的结果。
在1997年澳大利亚全国心理健康与幸福调查(N = 10641名成年人)中,使用国际人格障碍检查表问卷(IPDEQ)的59项版本评估PD,该问卷由经过培训的非临床访谈员以计算机化格式施测。
报告了三种IPDEQ评分方案(简单分类法,IPDEQ(S);基于ICD-10标准的分类法,IPDEQ(C);以及维度评分法,IPDEQ(D))的常模概况,同时还对IPDEQ的心理测量特性以及与轴I共病、残疾和选定心理社会特征的关联进行了检查。澳大利亚ICD-10 PD的总体发生率估计为6.5%,尽管对反社会PD的分类评估明显低估了其发生率。PD与较年轻的年龄、较差的功能以及在前12个月中共病轴I障碍的数量增加了七倍有关。
虽然在全国调查中用于评估PD的方法受到项目要求的限制,但根据一系列来源的数据,IPDEQ的总体表现被认为是令人满意的。特别是,虽然建议对IPDEQ的项目和子量表进行修订,但有证据表明,IPDEQ的总体维度评分应能提供PD总体可能性的有用自我报告指标。