Suppr超能文献

亲社会和攻击行为:一项纵向研究。

Prosocial and Aggressive Behavior: A Longitudinal Study.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Cardiff University.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University Belfast.

出版信息

Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2021 Jun;86(2):7-103. doi: 10.1111/mono.12427.

Abstract

Developmental theorists have made strong claims about the fundamental prosocial or aggressive nature of the human infant. However, only rarely have prosocial behavior and aggression been studied together in the same sample. We charted the parallel development of both behaviors from infancy to childhood in a British community sample, using a two-construct, multimethod longitudinal design. Data were drawn from the Cardiff Child Development Study (CCDS), a prospective longitudinal study of a volunteer sample of parents and their firstborn children. A sample of 332 mothers was recruited from National Health Service (NHS) prenatal clinics and general practice clinics in Wales, UK, between Fall of 2005 and Summer of 2007. Potential participants represented the full range of sociodemographic classifications of neighborhoods. Participating families were divided about equally between middle- and working-class families, were somewhat more likely to have sons than daughters, and the majority (90%) were in a stable partnership. In response to standard categories recommended for use in Wales at the time, the majority (93%) of mothers reported themselves as Welsh, Scottish, English, or Irish; most others named a European or South Asian nationality. Of the 332 families agreeing to participate, 321 mothers (M  = 28 years) and 285 partners (M  = 31 years) were interviewed during the pregnancy and 321 of the families contributed data at least once after the child's birth. After an initial home visit at 6 months, data collection occurred in four additional waves of testing when children's mean ages were approximately 1, 1.5, 2.5, and 7 years. Data collection alternated between family homes and Cardiff University. Of those families seen after the child's birth, 89% were assessed at the final wave of testing. Data collection ended in 2015. Methods included direct observation, experimental tasks, and collection of reports from mothers, fathers, other relatives or family friends, and classroom teachers. Interactions with a familiar peer were observed at 1.5 years. Interactions with unfamiliar peers took place during experimental birthday parties at 1 and 2.5 years. At 7 years, parents were interviewed, parents and teachers completed questionnaires, and the children engaged in cognitive and social decision-making tasks. Based on reports from parents and other informants who knew the children well, individual differences in both prosocial behavior and aggression were evident in children. Both types of behavior showed stability across the second and third years. The association between prosocial behavior and aggression changed over time: at 1.5 years, they were not significantly related (the association approached zero), but they became negatively correlated by 3 years. Different patterns were seen when children played with familiar versus unfamiliar peers. At 1.5 years, when children were observed at home with a familiar peer, prosocial behavior and aggression were unrelated, thus showing a pattern of results like that seen in the analysis of informants' reports. However, a different pattern emerged during the experimental birthday parties with unfamiliar peers: prosocial behavior and aggression were positively correlated at both 1 and 2.5 years, contributing to a general sociability factor at both ages. Gender differences in prosocial behavior were evident in informants' reports and were also evident at the 1-year (though not the 2.5-year) birthday parties. In contrast, gender differences in both prosocial behavior and aggression were evident by 7 years, both in children's aggressive decision-making and in their parents' and teachers' reports of children's aggressive behavior at home and school. By age 7, children's aggressive decision-making and behavior were inversely associated with their verbal skills, working memory, and emotional understanding. Some children had developed aggressive behavioral problems and callous-unemotional traits. A few (12%) met diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder or oppositional-defiant disorders, which had been predicted by early angry aggressiveness and lack of empathy for other people. Taken together, the findings revealed a gradual disaggregation of two ways in which children interact with other people. Individual differences in both prosocial behavior and aggression revealed continuity over time, with gender differences emerging first in prosocial behavior, then in aggression. Restrictions in the participant sample and the catchment area (e.g., all were first-time parents; all were drawn from a single region in the United Kingdom) mean that it is not possible to generalize findings broadly. It will be important to expand the study of prosocial behavior and aggression in other family and environmental contexts in future work. Learning more about early appearing individual differences in children's approaches to the social world may be useful for both educational and clinical practice.

摘要

发展理论家对人类婴儿的基本亲社会或攻击性天性提出了强烈的主张。然而,很少有研究将亲社会行为和攻击行为一起在同一个样本中进行研究。我们使用两构念、多方法纵向设计,在英国社区样本中追踪了这两种行为从婴儿期到儿童期的平行发展。数据来自卡迪夫儿童发展研究(CCDS),这是一项对父母及其第一个孩子的志愿者样本进行的前瞻性纵向研究。2005 年秋季至 2007 年夏季期间,从英国威尔士的国民保健服务(NHS)产前诊所和普通诊所招募了 332 名母亲作为样本。潜在的参与者代表了社区中各种社会人口统计学分类的全部范围。参与的家庭在中产阶级和工人阶级家庭之间大致相等,儿子比女儿略多,大多数(90%)处于稳定的伴侣关系中。根据当时在威尔士推荐使用的标准类别,大多数(93%)母亲将自己报告为威尔士人、苏格兰人、英格兰人或爱尔兰人;大多数其他人则选择了欧洲人或南亚人。在同意参与的 332 个家庭中,有 321 名母亲(M=28 岁)和 285 名伴侣(M=31 岁)在怀孕期间接受了访谈,在孩子出生后至少有一次向 321 个家庭提供了数据。在 6 个月的首次家访后,当孩子的平均年龄约为 1、1.5、2.5 和 7 岁时,进行了四次额外的测试波次的数据收集。数据收集在家庭住宅和卡迪夫大学之间交替进行。在孩子出生后见过的家庭中,89%在最后一次测试波次中接受了评估。数据收集于 2015 年结束。方法包括直接观察、实验任务以及从母亲、父亲、其他亲属或家庭朋友以及班主任那里收集报告。在 1.5 岁时观察与熟悉的同伴的互动。在 1 岁和 2.5 岁时,在实验生日派对上进行与不熟悉的同伴的互动。在 7 岁时,对父母进行了访谈,父母和老师完成了问卷,孩子们参与了认知和社会决策任务。根据了解孩子的父母和其他知情人的报告,儿童的亲社会行为和攻击行为存在个体差异。两种行为在第二年和第三年都表现出稳定性。亲社会行为和攻击行为之间的关联随时间而变化:在 1.5 岁时,它们没有显著相关(关联接近零),但到 3 岁时,它们呈负相关。当孩子与熟悉的同伴或不熟悉的同伴玩耍时,会出现不同的模式。在 1.5 岁时,当孩子在家中与熟悉的同伴观察时,亲社会行为和攻击行为没有关联,因此表现出与知情人报告分析中看到的结果类似的模式。然而,在与不熟悉的同伴举行的实验生日派对上出现了不同的模式:亲社会行为和攻击行为在 1 岁和 2.5 岁时都呈正相关,在这两个年龄段都促成了一种普遍的社交能力因素。亲社会行为的性别差异在知情人的报告中显而易见,在 1 岁(但不是 2.5 岁)的生日派对上也显而易见。相比之下,亲社会行为和攻击行为的性别差异在 7 岁时都很明显,既体现在儿童的攻击性决策中,也体现在儿童在家和学校的攻击性行为的父母和老师报告中。到 7 岁时,儿童的攻击性决策和行为与他们的语言技能、工作记忆和情绪理解能力呈负相关。一些儿童出现了攻击性行为问题和无情无义的特征。少数(12%)符合品行障碍或对立违抗性障碍的诊断标准,这是由早期愤怒的攻击性和对他人缺乏同理心预测的。总的来说,这些发现揭示了儿童与他人互动的两种方式逐渐分离开来。亲社会行为和攻击行为的个体差异随着时间的推移表现出连续性,性别差异首先出现在亲社会行为中,然后出现在攻击行为中。参与者样本和抽样区域的限制(例如,所有参与者都是初为人父母;所有参与者都来自英国的一个单一地区)意味着不可能广泛推广研究结果。在未来的工作中,在其他家庭和环境背景下研究亲社会行为和攻击行为将很重要。了解儿童对社会世界的早期出现的个体差异可能对教育和临床实践都有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1f0/9943493/3e3e8b5a562a/MONO-86-7-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验