• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亲社会和攻击行为:一项纵向研究。

Prosocial and Aggressive Behavior: A Longitudinal Study.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Cardiff University.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University Belfast.

出版信息

Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2021 Jun;86(2):7-103. doi: 10.1111/mono.12427.

DOI:10.1111/mono.12427
PMID:33973244
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9943493/
Abstract

Developmental theorists have made strong claims about the fundamental prosocial or aggressive nature of the human infant. However, only rarely have prosocial behavior and aggression been studied together in the same sample. We charted the parallel development of both behaviors from infancy to childhood in a British community sample, using a two-construct, multimethod longitudinal design. Data were drawn from the Cardiff Child Development Study (CCDS), a prospective longitudinal study of a volunteer sample of parents and their firstborn children. A sample of 332 mothers was recruited from National Health Service (NHS) prenatal clinics and general practice clinics in Wales, UK, between Fall of 2005 and Summer of 2007. Potential participants represented the full range of sociodemographic classifications of neighborhoods. Participating families were divided about equally between middle- and working-class families, were somewhat more likely to have sons than daughters, and the majority (90%) were in a stable partnership. In response to standard categories recommended for use in Wales at the time, the majority (93%) of mothers reported themselves as Welsh, Scottish, English, or Irish; most others named a European or South Asian nationality. Of the 332 families agreeing to participate, 321 mothers (M  = 28 years) and 285 partners (M  = 31 years) were interviewed during the pregnancy and 321 of the families contributed data at least once after the child's birth. After an initial home visit at 6 months, data collection occurred in four additional waves of testing when children's mean ages were approximately 1, 1.5, 2.5, and 7 years. Data collection alternated between family homes and Cardiff University. Of those families seen after the child's birth, 89% were assessed at the final wave of testing. Data collection ended in 2015. Methods included direct observation, experimental tasks, and collection of reports from mothers, fathers, other relatives or family friends, and classroom teachers. Interactions with a familiar peer were observed at 1.5 years. Interactions with unfamiliar peers took place during experimental birthday parties at 1 and 2.5 years. At 7 years, parents were interviewed, parents and teachers completed questionnaires, and the children engaged in cognitive and social decision-making tasks. Based on reports from parents and other informants who knew the children well, individual differences in both prosocial behavior and aggression were evident in children. Both types of behavior showed stability across the second and third years. The association between prosocial behavior and aggression changed over time: at 1.5 years, they were not significantly related (the association approached zero), but they became negatively correlated by 3 years. Different patterns were seen when children played with familiar versus unfamiliar peers. At 1.5 years, when children were observed at home with a familiar peer, prosocial behavior and aggression were unrelated, thus showing a pattern of results like that seen in the analysis of informants' reports. However, a different pattern emerged during the experimental birthday parties with unfamiliar peers: prosocial behavior and aggression were positively correlated at both 1 and 2.5 years, contributing to a general sociability factor at both ages. Gender differences in prosocial behavior were evident in informants' reports and were also evident at the 1-year (though not the 2.5-year) birthday parties. In contrast, gender differences in both prosocial behavior and aggression were evident by 7 years, both in children's aggressive decision-making and in their parents' and teachers' reports of children's aggressive behavior at home and school. By age 7, children's aggressive decision-making and behavior were inversely associated with their verbal skills, working memory, and emotional understanding. Some children had developed aggressive behavioral problems and callous-unemotional traits. A few (12%) met diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder or oppositional-defiant disorders, which had been predicted by early angry aggressiveness and lack of empathy for other people. Taken together, the findings revealed a gradual disaggregation of two ways in which children interact with other people. Individual differences in both prosocial behavior and aggression revealed continuity over time, with gender differences emerging first in prosocial behavior, then in aggression. Restrictions in the participant sample and the catchment area (e.g., all were first-time parents; all were drawn from a single region in the United Kingdom) mean that it is not possible to generalize findings broadly. It will be important to expand the study of prosocial behavior and aggression in other family and environmental contexts in future work. Learning more about early appearing individual differences in children's approaches to the social world may be useful for both educational and clinical practice.

摘要

发展理论家对人类婴儿的基本亲社会或攻击性天性提出了强烈的主张。然而,很少有研究将亲社会行为和攻击行为一起在同一个样本中进行研究。我们使用两构念、多方法纵向设计,在英国社区样本中追踪了这两种行为从婴儿期到儿童期的平行发展。数据来自卡迪夫儿童发展研究(CCDS),这是一项对父母及其第一个孩子的志愿者样本进行的前瞻性纵向研究。2005 年秋季至 2007 年夏季期间,从英国威尔士的国民保健服务(NHS)产前诊所和普通诊所招募了 332 名母亲作为样本。潜在的参与者代表了社区中各种社会人口统计学分类的全部范围。参与的家庭在中产阶级和工人阶级家庭之间大致相等,儿子比女儿略多,大多数(90%)处于稳定的伴侣关系中。根据当时在威尔士推荐使用的标准类别,大多数(93%)母亲将自己报告为威尔士人、苏格兰人、英格兰人或爱尔兰人;大多数其他人则选择了欧洲人或南亚人。在同意参与的 332 个家庭中,有 321 名母亲(M=28 岁)和 285 名伴侣(M=31 岁)在怀孕期间接受了访谈,在孩子出生后至少有一次向 321 个家庭提供了数据。在 6 个月的首次家访后,当孩子的平均年龄约为 1、1.5、2.5 和 7 岁时,进行了四次额外的测试波次的数据收集。数据收集在家庭住宅和卡迪夫大学之间交替进行。在孩子出生后见过的家庭中,89%在最后一次测试波次中接受了评估。数据收集于 2015 年结束。方法包括直接观察、实验任务以及从母亲、父亲、其他亲属或家庭朋友以及班主任那里收集报告。在 1.5 岁时观察与熟悉的同伴的互动。在 1 岁和 2.5 岁时,在实验生日派对上进行与不熟悉的同伴的互动。在 7 岁时,对父母进行了访谈,父母和老师完成了问卷,孩子们参与了认知和社会决策任务。根据了解孩子的父母和其他知情人的报告,儿童的亲社会行为和攻击行为存在个体差异。两种行为在第二年和第三年都表现出稳定性。亲社会行为和攻击行为之间的关联随时间而变化:在 1.5 岁时,它们没有显著相关(关联接近零),但到 3 岁时,它们呈负相关。当孩子与熟悉的同伴或不熟悉的同伴玩耍时,会出现不同的模式。在 1.5 岁时,当孩子在家中与熟悉的同伴观察时,亲社会行为和攻击行为没有关联,因此表现出与知情人报告分析中看到的结果类似的模式。然而,在与不熟悉的同伴举行的实验生日派对上出现了不同的模式:亲社会行为和攻击行为在 1 岁和 2.5 岁时都呈正相关,在这两个年龄段都促成了一种普遍的社交能力因素。亲社会行为的性别差异在知情人的报告中显而易见,在 1 岁(但不是 2.5 岁)的生日派对上也显而易见。相比之下,亲社会行为和攻击行为的性别差异在 7 岁时都很明显,既体现在儿童的攻击性决策中,也体现在儿童在家和学校的攻击性行为的父母和老师报告中。到 7 岁时,儿童的攻击性决策和行为与他们的语言技能、工作记忆和情绪理解能力呈负相关。一些儿童出现了攻击性行为问题和无情无义的特征。少数(12%)符合品行障碍或对立违抗性障碍的诊断标准,这是由早期愤怒的攻击性和对他人缺乏同理心预测的。总的来说,这些发现揭示了儿童与他人互动的两种方式逐渐分离开来。亲社会行为和攻击行为的个体差异随着时间的推移表现出连续性,性别差异首先出现在亲社会行为中,然后出现在攻击行为中。参与者样本和抽样区域的限制(例如,所有参与者都是初为人父母;所有参与者都来自英国的一个单一地区)意味着不可能广泛推广研究结果。在未来的工作中,在其他家庭和环境背景下研究亲社会行为和攻击行为将很重要。了解儿童对社会世界的早期出现的个体差异可能对教育和临床实践都有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1f0/9943493/de07678ab97b/MONO-86-7-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1f0/9943493/3e3e8b5a562a/MONO-86-7-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1f0/9943493/de07678ab97b/MONO-86-7-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1f0/9943493/3e3e8b5a562a/MONO-86-7-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1f0/9943493/de07678ab97b/MONO-86-7-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Prosocial and Aggressive Behavior: A Longitudinal Study.亲社会和攻击行为:一项纵向研究。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2021 Jun;86(2):7-103. doi: 10.1111/mono.12427.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Physical aggression during early childhood: trajectories and predictors.幼儿期的身体攻击行为:发展轨迹及预测因素
Pediatrics. 2004 Jul;114(1):e43-50. doi: 10.1542/peds.114.1.e43.
4
Onset and persistence of childhood asthma: predictors from infancy.儿童哮喘的发病与持续:来自婴儿期的预测因素。
Pediatrics. 2001 Oct;108(4):E69. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.4.e69.
5
The socio-behavioral development of children with symptoms of attachment disorder: An observational study of teacher sensitivity in special education.有依恋障碍症状儿童的社会行为发展:特殊教育中教师敏感性的观察研究。
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Sep;56:71-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.05.014. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
6
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
7
Impact of Low Social Preference on the Development of Depressive and Aggressive Symptoms: Buffering by Children's Prosocial Behavior.低社交偏好对抑郁和攻击症状发展的影响:儿童亲社会行为的缓冲作用。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2018 Oct;46(7):1497-1507. doi: 10.1007/s10802-017-0382-6.
8
Developmental trajectories of physical aggression and prosocial behavior in early childhood: Family antecedents and psychological correlates.幼儿期身体攻击和亲社会行为的发展轨迹:家庭前因和心理关联。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Jun;55(6):1211-1225. doi: 10.1037/dev0000714. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
9
Social Emotional Competence, Learning Outcomes, Emotional and Behavioral Difficulties of Preschool Children: Parent and Teacher Evaluations.学龄前儿童的社会情感能力、学习成果、情绪和行为问题:家长和教师评价
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 3;12:760782. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.760782. eCollection 2021.
10
Ready to make nice: parental socialization of young sons' and daughters' prosocial behaviors with peers.准备好表现友善:父母对年幼子女与同伴亲社会行为的社会化培养。
J Genet Psychol. 2007 Jun;168(2):177-200. doi: 10.3200/GNTP.168.2.177-200.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between ear appearance and psychological function among congenital unilateral microtia after autologous cartilage ear reconstruction: a chain mediation model.自体软骨耳再造术后先天性单侧小耳畸形患者耳部外观与心理功能的关系:链式中介模型
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 24;13(1):826. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03073-5.
2
The effect of time pressure and ego depletion on young children's helping behavior.时间压力和自我损耗对幼儿助人行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 17;16:1584248. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1584248. eCollection 2025.
3
Psychometric properties of the Arabic versions of the perceived social competence scale and the prosociality scale.

本文引用的文献

1
Toddlers' Reactions to the Distress of Familiar Peers: The Importance of Context.幼儿对熟悉同伴痛苦的反应:情境的重要性。
Infancy. 2004 Sep;6(2):299-318. doi: 10.1207/s15327078in0602_9. Epub 2004 Sep 1.
2
Infants' Use of Force to Defend Toys: The Origins of Instrumental Aggression.婴儿使用武力捍卫玩具:工具性攻击行为的起源。
Infancy. 2011 Sep;16(5):471-489. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2011.00069.x. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
3
Caring babies: Concern for others in distress during infancy.关爱婴儿:婴儿时期对他人痛苦的关注。
感知社会能力量表和亲社会量表阿拉伯语版本的心理测量特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Feb 21;23(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02341-7.
4
What Do We Know About the Stop Now and Plan Program? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of an Early Invention for Children and Youth with Conduct Problems.我们对“立即停止并制定计划”项目了解多少?对一项针对有行为问题的儿童和青少年的早期干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prev Sci. 2025 Feb 14. doi: 10.1007/s11121-025-01788-w.
5
Uncovering hidden prosocial behaviors underlying aggression motivation in mice and young children.揭示老鼠和幼儿攻击动机背后隐藏的亲社会行为。
Behav Brain Funct. 2024 Nov 28;20(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12993-024-00260-z.
6
Activation of somatostatin neurons in the medial amygdala reverses long-term aggression and social deficits associated to early-life stress in male mice.激活内侧杏仁核中的生长抑素神经元可逆转雄性小鼠与早期生活应激相关的长期攻击行为和社交缺陷。
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 May;30(5):2168-2182. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02829-6. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
7
Does Prosociality in Early-to Mid-Adolescence Protect Against Later Development of Antisocial Behaviours?青少年早期到中期的亲社会行为能否预防后期反社会行为的发展?
J Early Adolesc. 2024 Nov;44(9):1124-1153. doi: 10.1177/02724316231210254. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
8
Assessing the Relationship between Prosocial Behavior and Well-Being: Basic Psychological Need as the Mediator.评估亲社会行为与幸福感之间的关系:以基本心理需求为中介变量
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023 Oct 7;13(10):2179-2191. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13100153.
9
Neurodevelopmental dimensional assessment of young children at high genomic risk of neuropsychiatric conditions.对具有神经精神疾病高基因组风险的幼儿进行神经发育维度评估。
JCPP Adv. 2023 May 4;3(2):e12162. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12162. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
Adolescents' Perceptions of Social Risk and Prosocial Tendencies: Developmental Change and Individual Differences.青少年对社会风险和亲社会倾向的认知:发展变化与个体差异
Soc Dev. 2023 Feb;32(1):188-203. doi: 10.1111/sode.12630. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
Dev Sci. 2021 Mar;24(2):e13016. doi: 10.1111/desc.13016. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
4
Continuity and change in anger and aggressiveness from infancy to childhood: The protective effects of positive parenting.从婴儿期到儿童期愤怒和攻击性的连续性和变化:积极育儿的保护作用。
Dev Psychopathol. 2021 Aug;33(3):937-956. doi: 10.1017/S0954579420000243.
5
A meta-analysis of the associations between callous-unemotional traits and empathy, prosociality, and guilt.一项关于冷酷无情特质与同理心、亲社会行为和内疚感之间关联的元分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Feb;75:101809. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101809. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
6
The Social Origins of Human Prosociality.人类亲社会行为的社会起源
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2019 Jun;28(3):274-279. doi: 10.1177/0963721419830386. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
7
Developmental Differences in Prosocial Behavior Between Preschool and Late Elementary School.学前儿童与小学高年级学生亲社会行为的发展差异
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 26;10:876. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00876. eCollection 2019.
8
The Science of Early Moral Development: on Defining, Constructing, and Studying Morality from Birth.早期道德发展科学:从出生开始定义、构建和研究道德。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2019;56:1-35. doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
9
Parenting Is an Environmental Predictor of Callous-Unemotional Traits and Aggression: A Monozygotic Twin Differences Study.养育方式是反社会、冷酷无情特质和攻击行为的环境预测因素:一项同卵双胞胎差异研究。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;57(12):955-963. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.07.882. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
10
Informants' ratings of activity level in infancy predict ADHD symptoms and diagnoses in childhood.informant对婴儿期活动水平的评分可预测儿童期的多动症症状及诊断结果。
Dev Psychopathol. 2019 Oct;31(4):1255-1269. doi: 10.1017/S0954579418000597.