Jackson Alison A, Manan Wan A, Gani Abdullah S, Eldridge Sandra, Carter Yvonne H
Department of Community Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2004 Sep;35(3):748-55.
Smoking deception is often ignored, but is important in health care. In this trial it was assessed at both study entry and outcome. At study entry, 1,044 males at a primary care clinic were asked smoking status and tested for breath carbon monoxide (CO). Of self-reported non-smokers, 57/402 (14%) were actually smokers, as were 59/251 (24%) of self-reported ex-smokers. The self-reported smokers (n=387) entered a randomized, controlled trial where the intervention comprised four questions on knowledge and beliefs about smoking, standardized verbal advice against smoking, and a leaflet. At follow-up, subjects were also questioned about beliefs. Follow-up was difficult, but 191/387 (49%) attended at three or six months. Of 27 who claimed to have quit, 6 (22%) were deceivers and 21 were confirmed quitters. Cessation did not differ between intervention and control groups. Overall confirmed cessation at six months was 16/387 (4.1 %). Confirmed quitters were significantly lighter smokers than deceivers and still smokers. There were non-significant trends between the outcome groups whereby deceivers had least knowledge and most lay beliefs, and quitters had most knowledge and fewest lay beliefs. The lay beliefs may prevent some smokers from quitting.
吸烟瞒报情况常常被忽视,但在医疗保健领域却很重要。在本试验中,对吸烟瞒报情况在研究开始时和研究结果阶段均进行了评估。在研究开始时,一家初级保健诊所的1044名男性被询问吸烟状况,并接受了呼出气一氧化碳(CO)检测。在自报不吸烟者中,57/402(14%)实际上是吸烟者,在自报已戒烟者中,59/251(24%)实际上仍在吸烟。自报吸烟者(n = 387)进入了一项随机对照试验,干预措施包括四个关于吸烟知识和信念的问题、标准化的戒烟口头建议以及一份传单。在随访时,还对受试者的信念进行了询问。随访工作存在困难,但191/387(49%)的受试者在三个月或六个月时前来随访。在27名声称已戒烟的受试者中,6名(22%)是瞒报者,21名是经确认的戒烟者。干预组和对照组之间的戒烟情况没有差异。六个月时经确认的总体戒烟率为16/387(4.1%)。经确认的戒烟者吸烟量明显低于瞒报者和仍在吸烟的人。在不同结果组之间存在不显著的趋势,即瞒报者知识最少且外行信念最多,而戒烟者知识最多且外行信念最少。这些外行信念可能会阻碍一些吸烟者戒烟。