Suppr超能文献

对不良事件负有责任感对医生个人生活和职业生涯的影响:接受同事批评的重要性。

Impact of feeling responsible for adverse events on doctors' personal and professional lives: the importance of being open to criticism from colleagues.

作者信息

Aasland O G, Førde R

机构信息

The Research Institute, The Norwegian Medical Association, P O B 1152 Sentrum, N-0107 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Feb;14(1):13-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2002.003657.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of adverse events that had caused patient injury and for which the doctor felt responsible, and the experience of acceptance of criticism among colleagues.

DESIGN

Self-reports based on postal questionnaires to 1616 doctors.

SETTING

Norway.

PARTICIPANTS

A representative sample of 1318 active doctors.

RESULTS

368/1294 (28%) reported that they had experienced at least one adverse event with serious patient injury. Being male and working within a surgical discipline (including anaesthesiology, obstetrics and gynaecology) significantly increased the probability of such reports. 38% of the events had been reported to official authorities and, for 17% of doctors, the incident had a negative impact on their private life; 6% had needed professional help. 50% and 54%, respectively, found it difficult to criticise colleagues for their ethically or professionally unacceptable conduct. Doctors who found it easy to criticise colleagues also reported having received more support from their colleagues after a serious patient injury.

CONCLUSION

Male surgeons report the highest prevalence of adverse events. Criticism for professionally and ethically unacceptable conduct is difficult to express among doctors. More acceptance of criticism of professional conduct may not only prevent patient harm, but may also give more support to colleagues who have experienced serious patient injury.

摘要

目的

调查导致患者受伤且医生认为自己应承担责任的不良事件的影响,以及同事间接受批评的经历。

设计

基于对1616名医生进行邮寄问卷调查的自我报告。

地点

挪威。

参与者

1318名在职医生的代表性样本。

结果

368/1294(28%)报告称他们至少经历过一次导致患者严重受伤的不良事件。男性以及从事外科专业(包括麻醉学、妇产科)工作显著增加了此类报告的可能性。38%的事件已上报官方机构,17%的医生表示该事件对其私人生活有负面影响;6%的人需要专业帮助。分别有50%和54%的人发现很难因同事在道德或专业上不可接受的行为而对其提出批评。那些觉得容易批评同事的医生也报告称,在发生严重患者伤害事件后,他们从同事那里得到了更多支持。

结论

男性外科医生报告的不良事件发生率最高。在医生中,很难对专业和道德上不可接受的行为提出批评。更多地接受对专业行为的批评不仅可以防止患者受到伤害,还可能给予经历过严重患者伤害的同事更多支持。

相似文献

4
Moral distress among Norwegian doctors.
J Med Ethics. 2008 Jul;34(7):521-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.021246.
5
Do faculty and resident physicians discuss their medical errors?
J Med Ethics. 2008 Oct;34(10):717-22. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.023713.
6
Patients' complaints about doctors in surgical training.
N Z Med J. 2006 Jun 23;119(1236):U2026.
7
[Positive feedback for good medical work--a short-supply commodity?].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1997 Mar 20;117(8):1094-8.
9
Peer support: healthcare professionals supporting each other after adverse medical events.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Aug;17(4):249-52. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.025536.
10
Doctors' views of attitudes towards peer medical error.
Postgrad Med J. 2010 Feb;86(1012):123-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.025015.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating the Second Victim Experience in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Colonoscopy.
JGH Open. 2025 Jul 1;9(7):e70215. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70215. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Attributes of a Good Microsurgeon-A Brief Counsel to the Up-and-Coming Prospects.
Arch Plast Surg. 2023 Feb 6;50(1):130-140. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1759786. eCollection 2023 Jan.
6
North-African doctors as second victims of medical errors: a cross sectional survey.
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 20;22(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04049-0.
7
Second victims in health care: current perspectives.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Aug 12;10:593-603. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S185912. eCollection 2019.
8
Nurses' families' experiences of involvement in nursing errors: A qualitative study.
Int J Nurs Sci. 2019 Jan 14;6(2):154-161. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.01.004. eCollection 2019 Apr 10.
9
Assessment of Physician Well-being, Part One: Burnout and Other Negative States.
West J Emerg Med. 2019 Mar;20(2):278-290. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.1.39665. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
10

本文引用的文献

2
Whistleblowing in academic medicine.
J Med Ethics. 2004 Feb;30(1):35-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.005553.
5
[Changes in drinking habits among Norwegian physicians 1985-2000].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2002 Nov 30;122(29):2791-4.
6
Medical end-of-life decisions in Norway.
Resuscitation. 2002 Dec;55(3):235-40. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00270-8.
7
[What does it feel like for a physician to be a gatekeeper?].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2002 Aug 20;122(19):1874-9.
8
Bristol inquiry condemns hospital's "club culture".
BMJ. 2001 Jul 28;323(7306):181. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7306.181.
9
One Bristol, but there could have been many.
BMJ. 2001 Jul 28;323(7306):179-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7306.179.
10
Threats from patients and their effects on medical decision making: a cross-sectional, randomised trial.
Lancet. 2001 Apr 21;357(9264):1258-61. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04407-X.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验