Tung Ko-Hui, Wilkens Lynne R, Wu Anna H, McDuffie Katharine, Nomura Abraham M Y, Kolonel Laurence N, Terada Keith Y, Goodman Marc T
Cancer Etiology Program, Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.
Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Feb 15;161(4):321-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi046.
Risk factors for ovarian cancer may differ between pre- and postmenopausal women. The authors used data from a multiethnic, population-based, case-control study, conducted between 1993 and 1999 in Hawaii and Los Angeles, California, to examine whether menopause modified the effect of ovulation on ovarian cancer risk. A structured questionnaire was administered to 558 histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer cases and 607 population controls. Lifetime ovulatory (log)years were significantly associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer (odds ratio = 1.78, 95% confidence interval: 1.24, 2.57), particularly among premenopausal women (odds ratio = 2.49) but not among postmenopausal women (odds ratio = 0.88) (p(interaction) = 0.006). Factors that induced anovulation, including oral contraceptives, pregnancy, and breastfeeding, were associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer. Among anovulation factors, prolonged oral contraceptive pill use provided a greater protective effect against premenopausal ovarian cancer than against postmenopausal ovarian cancer (for > or =5.4 years of use vs. never use: odds ratio = 0.28, 95% confidence interval: 0.15, 0.52 vs. odds ratio = 0.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.31, 1.08, respectively), but the difference was not significant (p(interaction) = 0.20). Association of breastfeeding and pregnancy with ovarian cancer risk was also similar between pre- and postmenopausal women (respective p(interaction) = 0.72 and 0.43). The authors' data support the hypothesis that lifetime ovulation is involved in the pathogenesis of pre- but not postmenopausal ovarian cancer, while the protective effects of anovulation factors persist from pre- to postmenopausal women.
卵巢癌的风险因素在绝经前和绝经后女性中可能有所不同。作者利用1993年至1999年在夏威夷和加利福尼亚州洛杉矶开展的一项基于人群的多民族病例对照研究的数据,来检验绝经是否会改变排卵对卵巢癌风险的影响。对558例经组织学确诊的上皮性卵巢癌病例和607名人群对照进行了结构化问卷调查。终生排卵(对数)年数与卵巢癌风险增加显著相关(比值比=1.78,95%置信区间:1.24,2.57),尤其是在绝经前女性中(比值比=2.49),而在绝经后女性中则不然(比值比=0.88)(交互作用p值=0.006)。包括口服避孕药、怀孕和哺乳在内的诱导无排卵的因素与卵巢癌风险降低相关。在无排卵因素中,长期使用口服避孕药对绝经前卵巢癌的保护作用比对绝经后卵巢癌更大(使用≥5.4年与从未使用相比:比值比分别为0.28,95%置信区间:0.15,0.52和比值比=0.58,95%置信区间:0.31,1.08),但差异不显著(交互作用p值=0.20)。绝经前和绝经后女性中,哺乳和怀孕与卵巢癌风险的关联也相似(交互作用p值分别为0.72和0.43)。作者的数据支持这样的假设,即终生排卵参与绝经前而非绝经后卵巢癌的发病机制,而无排卵因素的保护作用在绝经前和绝经后女性中均持续存在。