• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一份用于衡量急诊科信任度的问卷设计。

Design of a questionnaire to measure trust in an emergency department.

作者信息

Kelly John J, Njuki Fred, Lane Peter L, McKinley Robert K

机构信息

DO, Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein Medical Center, 5501 Old York Road, Philadelphia, PA 19141, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Feb;12(2):147-51. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2003.01.002.

DOI:10.1197/j.aem.2003.01.002
PMID:15692136
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a valid and reliable questionnaire for measuring patient trust in an emergency department (ED) that can be administered by phone, direct interview, or mail.

METHODS

This was a survey conducted at a Level 1 urban trauma center with an annual census of 52,000 visits. Literature review, focus group discussions, and direct patient interviews identified potential items for pilot surveys. Fifteen ED nurses, residents, and faculty scored the items on a 1-10 scale, rephrasing or removing ambiguous items to ensure face and content validity. A telephone survey with responses recorded on a five-point Likert scale was conducted. Reliability and internal consistency of items were tested using SPSS software. Factor analyses were performed using principal components analysis and Varimax rotation with Eigen values set at 1.0.

RESULTS

A total of 383 patients seen in the ED were surveyed. Using two pilot surveys, 18 of 42 potential items were extracted among five factors identified as important to the development of trust. Internal consistency for the final 18 items was calculated, and a Cronbach's alpha of 0.88 was obtained for all items. Test-retest reliability was calculated by telephoning 38 patients twice, two weeks apart, and correlation coefficients of >0.748 were obtained for all items.

CONCLUSIONS

This questionnaire can be used for telephone or direct interview to survey patients' trust in EDs.

摘要

目的

开发一种有效且可靠的问卷,用于测量急诊科患者的信任度,该问卷可通过电话、直接访谈或邮寄方式进行发放。

方法

这是一项在一家一级城市创伤中心进行的调查,该中心年就诊量为52000人次。通过文献综述、焦点小组讨论和直接患者访谈确定了初步调查的潜在项目。15名急诊科护士、住院医师和教员对这些项目进行1至10分的评分,对表述模糊的项目进行重新措辞或删除,以确保表面效度和内容效度。进行了一项电话调查,调查结果采用五点李克特量表记录。使用SPSS软件测试项目的信度和内部一致性。采用主成分分析和方差最大化旋转进行因子分析,特征值设定为1.0。

结果

共对383名在急诊科就诊的患者进行了调查。通过两次初步调查,在确定对信任发展重要的五个因素中提取了42个潜在项目中的18个。计算了最终18个项目的内部一致性,所有项目的克朗巴哈系数为0.88。通过对38名患者进行为期两周的两次电话随访计算重测信度,所有项目的相关系数均>0.748。

结论

该问卷可用于电话或直接访谈,以调查患者对急诊科的信任度。

相似文献

1
Design of a questionnaire to measure trust in an emergency department.一份用于衡量急诊科信任度的问卷设计。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Feb;12(2):147-51. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2003.01.002.
2
Development and validation of the patient trust in community pharmacists (TRUST-Ph) scale: results from a study conducted in Thailand.社区药剂师患者信任度(TRUST-Ph)量表的开发与验证:泰国一项研究的结果
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2008 Sep;4(3):272-83. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2007.10.002. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
3
The Diabetes Continuity of Care Scale: the development and initial evaluation of a questionnaire that measures continuity of care from the patient perspective.糖尿病连续性照护量表:一份从患者角度衡量照护连续性的问卷的开发与初步评估。
Health Soc Care Community. 2004 Nov;12(6):475-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2004.00517.x.
4
Patient perspective on quality of geriatric care and rehabilitation--development and psychometric testing of a questionnaire.患者对老年护理与康复质量的看法——一份问卷的编制与心理测量学测试
Scand J Caring Sci. 2006 Jun;20(2):135-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00390.x.
5
Developing a valid and reliable Self-Efficacy in Clinical Performance scale.开发一个有效且可靠的临床操作自我效能感量表。
Int Nurs Rev. 2009 Jun;56(2):214-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2008.00685.x.
6
Development of a questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF-QoL).开发一份用于测量心房颤动患者健康相关生活质量的问卷(AF-QoL)。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Jul 4;5:37. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-37.
7
Development, reliability and validity of an instrument measuring the attitudes and knowledge of Emergency Department staff regarding the Emergency Nurse Practitioner role.
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2005 Jan;13(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2004.10.014.
8
Relatives' perspective on the quality of geriatric care and rehabilitation--development and testing of a questionnaire.亲属对老年护理和康复质量的看法——一份问卷的开发与测试
Scand J Caring Sci. 2008 Dec;22(4):590-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00571.x.
9
The OutPatient Experiences Questionnaire (OPEQ): data quality, reliability, and validity in patients attending 52 Norwegian hospitals.门诊患者体验问卷(OPEQ):挪威52家医院患者的数据质量、信度和效度
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Dec;14(6):433-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014423.
10
Development of a 32-item scale to assess postoperative dysfunction after upper gastrointestinal cancer resection.开发一个32项量表以评估上消化道癌切除术后的功能障碍。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jun;17(11):1440-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02179.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Trust in Medicine: A Scoping Review of the Instruments Designed to Measure Trust in Medical Care Studies.对医学的信任:旨在衡量对医疗保健研究信任度的工具的范围综述
J Caring Sci. 2024 Jan 13;13(2):116-137. doi: 10.34172/jcs.33152. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Development and validation of the Trust in Multidimensional Healthcare Systems Scale (TIMHSS).多维医疗保健系统信任量表(TIMHSS)的开发和验证。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 May 8;23(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02162-y.
3
Psychometric properties of trust in trauma care in an emergency department tool.
创伤护理信任在急诊科工具中的心理测量学特性。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Dec;49(6):2615-2622. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02348-z. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
4
Examining trust between supervisors and trainees in the pediatric emergency department.审视儿科急诊科主管与实习生之间的信任关系。
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Apr 11;7(2):e10857. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10857. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
Trust in healthcare settings: Scale development, methods, and preliminary determinants.医疗机构中的信任:量表开发、方法及初步决定因素
SAGE Open Med. 2016 Sep 1;4:2050312116664224. doi: 10.1177/2050312116664224. eCollection 2016.