Meyer T, Davison R C R, Kindermann W
Institute of Sports and Preventive Medicine, University of Saarland, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Int J Sports Med. 2005 Feb;26 Suppl 1:S19-27. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-830507.
This article summarizes the scientific literature on portable devices used for the measurement of gas exchange during exercise. Firstly, the results from validity investigations are reviewed in terms of accuracy, reliability, and influence of additional weight during field testing. On the basis of these findings, at least two of the most often tested portable devices, MetaMax I/II and K2/K4 b (2), can be regarded as valid, with their results not differing substantially from (stationary) metabolic carts. The second part of the article provides an overview of ambulatory gas exchange applications which have been investigated so far. There is a number of descriptive (cross-sectional) studies that characterize the physiological profiles of different sports. In addition, some diagnostic tests of functional capacity have been validated, and a few investigations have assessed nutritional interventions and their effect on metabolism. Some indicate potential future directions including an evaluation of the efficacy of modifying metabolic pathways during exercise, e. g. by specifically designed training. Also, the extension of descriptive/cross-sectional investigations to typical training sessions will be worthwhile.
本文总结了关于运动期间用于测量气体交换的便携式设备的科学文献。首先,从准确性、可靠性以及现场测试期间额外重量的影响等方面对有效性调查结果进行了综述。基于这些发现,至少两种最常测试的便携式设备,即MetaMax I/II和K2/K4 b (2),可被视为有效,其结果与(固定式)代谢车的结果没有实质性差异。本文的第二部分概述了迄今为止已被研究的动态气体交换应用。有许多描述性(横断面)研究对不同运动的生理特征进行了表征。此外,一些功能能力的诊断测试已经得到验证,并且一些研究评估了营养干预及其对代谢的影响。一些研究指出了潜在的未来方向,包括评估运动期间改变代谢途径的功效,例如通过专门设计的训练。此外,将描述性/横断面研究扩展到典型训练课程将是值得的。