Nieder Carsten, Grosu Anca L, Andratschke Nicolaus H, Molls Michael
Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Mar 1;61(3):851-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.016.
Driven by numerous reports on recovery of occult radiation injury, reirradiation of the spinal cord today is considered a realistic option. In rodents, long-term recovery was observed to start at approximately 8 weeks. However, prospective clinical studies are lacking. Therefore, a combined analysis of all published clinical data might provide a valuable basis for future trials.
We collected data from 40 individual patients published in eight different reports after a comprehensive MEDLINE search. These represent all patients with data available for dose per fraction and total dose of each of both treatment courses. We recalculated the biologically effective dose (BED) according to the linear-quadratic model using an alpha/beta value of 2 Gy for the cervical and thoracic cord and 4 Gy for the lumbar cord. In this model, a dose of 50 Gy given in single daily fractions of 2 Gy is equivalent to a BED of 100 Gy(2) or 75 Gy(4). For treatment with two daily fractions, a correction term was introduced to take incomplete repair of sublethal damage into account.
The cumulative doses ranged from 108 to 205 Gy(2) (median dose, 135 Gy(2)). The median interval between both series was 20 months. Three patients were treated to the lumbar segments only. The median follow-up was 17 months for patients without myelopathy. Eleven patients developed myelopathy after 4-25 months (median, 11 months). Myelopathy was seen only in patients who had received one course to a dose of > or =102 Gy(2) (n = 9) or were retreated after 2 months (n = 2). In the absence of these two risk factors, no myelopathy developed in 19 patients treated with < or =135.5 Gy(2) or 7 patients treated with 136-150 Gy(2). A risk score based on the cumulative BED, the greatest BED for all treatment series in a particular individual, and interval was developed. Low-risk patients remained free of myelopathy and 33% of intermediate-risk patients and 90% of high-risk patients developed myelopathy.
On the basis of these literature data (and with due caution), the risk of myelopathy appears small after < or =135.5 Gy(2) when the interval is not shorter than 6 months and the dose of each course is < or =98 Gy(2). We would recommend limiting the dose to this level, whenever technically feasible. However, it appears prudent to propose the collection of prospective data from a greater number of patients receiving doses in the range of 136-150 Gy(2) to assess the safety of higher retreatment doses for those patients in whom limited doses might compromise tumor control.
受众多关于隐匿性放射损伤恢复的报道推动,如今脊髓再照射被认为是一种现实的选择。在啮齿动物中,观察到长期恢复大约在8周时开始。然而,缺乏前瞻性临床研究。因此,对所有已发表的临床数据进行综合分析可能为未来试验提供有价值的基础。
在全面检索MEDLINE后,我们从八篇不同报告中收集了40例个体患者的数据。这些代表了所有可获得每个治疗疗程的分次剂量和总剂量数据的患者。我们根据线性二次模型重新计算生物等效剂量(BED),颈椎和胸椎脊髓的α/β值为2 Gy,腰椎脊髓的α/β值为4 Gy。在此模型中,每日单次给予2 Gy剂量的50 Gy相当于100 Gy(2)或75 Gy(4)的BED。对于每日两次分次治疗,引入了一个校正项以考虑亚致死损伤的不完全修复。
累积剂量范围为108至205 Gy(2)(中位剂量,135 Gy(2))。两个疗程之间的中位间隔为20个月。仅3例患者接受了腰椎节段的治疗。无脊髓病患者的中位随访时间为17个月。11例患者在4至25个月(中位,11个月)后发生脊髓病。脊髓病仅见于接受一个疗程剂量≥102 Gy(2)的患者(n = 9)或在2个月后接受再治疗的患者(n = 2)。在没有这两个危险因素的情况下,19例接受≤135.5 Gy(2)治疗的患者和7例接受136 - 150 Gy(2)治疗的患者未发生脊髓病。基于累积BED、特定个体所有治疗系列的最大BED和间隔时间建立了一个风险评分。低风险患者未发生脊髓病,33%的中风险患者和90%的高风险患者发生了脊髓病。
基于这些文献数据(并谨慎考虑),当间隔不短于6个月且每个疗程剂量≤98 Gy(2)时,≤135.5 Gy(2)后发生脊髓病的风险似乎较小。只要技术可行,我们建议将剂量限制在此水平。然而,建议收集更多接受136 - 150 Gy(2)剂量患者的前瞻性数据,以评估对于那些有限剂量可能会影响肿瘤控制的患者,更高再治疗剂量的安全性,这似乎是谨慎的做法。