Gopal A S, King D L, Katz J, Boxt L M, King D L, Shao M Y
Department of Radiology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1992 Mar-Apr;5(2):115-24. doi: 10.1016/s0894-7317(14)80541-5.
Two-dimensional echocardiographic methods of left ventricular volume computation are limited by geometric assumptions and image plane positioning error in the nonvisualized dimension. We evaluated a three-dimensional (3D echocardiographic method that addresses these limitations. Our method uses a volume computation algorithm based on polyhedral surface reconstruction (PSR) and nonparallel, unequally spaced, nonintersecting short-axis planes. Seventeen balloon phantoms were subjected to volume computation by the 3D echocardiography-PSR method and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compared to true volumes determined by water displacement. The results for 3D echocardiography-PSR were: accuracy = 2.27%, interobserver variability = 4.33%, r = 0.999, SEE = 2.45 ml, and p less than 0.001. Results for MRI were 8.01%, 13.78%, r = 0.995, SEE = 7.01 ml, and p less than 0.001. There was no statistically significant difference between the methods. We conclude that precise image plane positioning and use of the 3D echocardiographic-PSR volume computation method achieves high accuracy and reproducibility in vitro. The excellent in vitro correlation between 3D echocardiography-PSR and MRI indicates that MRI may also serve as an in vivo standard of comparison.
二维超声心动图计算左心室容积的方法受到几何假设以及非可视化维度中图像平面定位误差的限制。我们评估了一种三维(3D)超声心动图方法,该方法可解决这些限制。我们的方法使用基于多面体表面重建(PSR)以及非平行、不等间距、不相交的短轴平面的容积计算算法。对17个球囊模型采用3D超声心动图 - PSR方法和磁共振成像(MRI)进行容积计算,并与通过水置换法确定的真实容积进行比较。3D超声心动图 - PSR的结果为:准确度 = 2.27%,观察者间变异性 = 4.33%,r = 0.999,标准误(SEE) = 2.45 ml,p < 0.001。MRI的结果为:8.01%,13.78%,r = 0.995,SEE = 7.01 ml,p < 0.001。两种方法之间无统计学显著差异。我们得出结论,精确的图像平面定位以及使用3D超声心动图 - PSR容积计算方法在体外可实现高精度和可重复性。3D超声心动图 - PSR与MRI在体外的良好相关性表明,MRI也可作为体内比较的标准。