Xavier Ana Carolina Galtarossa, Siqueira Sheila Aparecida Coelho, Costa Luciano José Megale, Mauad Thais, Nascimento Saldiva Paulo Hilário
Department of Pathology, Sao Paulo University Medical School, University of Colorado Health and Science Center, Campus Box 8117, PO Box 6511, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Virchows Arch. 2005 Mar;446(3):225-31. doi: 10.1007/s00428-004-1186-y. Epub 2005 Feb 15.
Autopsy findings of missed diagnoses that would probably have changed management or prognosis occur in up to 29% of cases in general hospitals. Such proportions may be higher in subsets of patients with complex diseases. We reviewed 2908 consecutive autopsies performed over a period of 29 months in a large-volume hospital, analyzing 118 autopsies of patients with hematological malignancies or severe aplastic anemia. A review of macroscopic reports as well as microscopic examination of tissue samples was performed. Medical records were reviewed for clinical diagnoses. Discordances between clinical and autopsy diagnoses were classified using Goldman's criteria. Additionally, we searched for clinical parameters correlated with occurrence of class-I discrepancy using a multivariate method. Median age was 46.5 years, and 25.4% had received a hematopoietic stem-cell transplant. Overall, 11.9% (6.6-19.1%) of patients died before conclusion of the hematological diagnosis and 33% (24.6-42.3%) died with no active hematological disease. We found class-I discrepancy in 31.3% (23.1-40.5 %) of cases. The most common among these diagnoses were hematological disease, pneumonia and gastrointestinal bleeding. In a univariate analysis, being elderly (P=0.04) was positively correlated with the finding of class-I discrepancies; while, having received previous specific hematological treatment (P=0.0005) or hematopoietic stem-cell transplants (P=0.013), or being admitted to a specialized hematology unit (P=0.0006) were negatively correlated to the occurrence of such discrepancies. Multivariate analysis showed that care in a specialized hematology unit (OR 0.34, 0.12-0.93) was independently associated with lower occurrence of discrepancies. We concluded that critical diagnoses are often missed in highly complex hematological patients especially in the absence of admission to specialized hematology units.
在综合医院中,尸检发现的漏诊情况可能会改变治疗方案或预后,此类情况在高达29%的病例中出现。在患有复杂疾病的患者亚组中,这一比例可能更高。我们回顾了一家大型医院在29个月内连续进行的2908例尸检,分析了118例血液系统恶性肿瘤或重型再生障碍性贫血患者的尸检情况。进行了宏观报告审查以及组织样本的显微镜检查。查阅病历以获取临床诊断信息。使用戈德曼标准对临床诊断与尸检诊断之间的差异进行分类。此外,我们采用多变量方法寻找与I类差异发生相关的临床参数。中位年龄为46.5岁,25.4%的患者接受过造血干细胞移植。总体而言,11.9%(6.6 - 19.1%)的患者在血液学诊断完成前死亡,33%(24.6 - 42.3%)的患者死亡时无活动性血液系统疾病。我们发现31.3%(23.1 - 40.5%)的病例存在I类差异。这些诊断中最常见的是血液系统疾病、肺炎和胃肠道出血。单变量分析显示,老年(P = 0.04)与I类差异的发现呈正相关;而此前接受过特定血液学治疗(P = 0.0005)或造血干细胞移植(P = 0.013),或入住专门的血液科病房(P = 0.0006)与此类差异的发生呈负相关。多变量分析表明,在专门的血液科病房接受治疗(OR 0.34,0.12 - 0.93)与差异发生率较低独立相关。我们得出结论,在高度复杂的血液学患者中,尤其是在未入住专门血液科病房的情况下,关键诊断常常被漏诊。