Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房的临床诊断与尸检诊断:一项前瞻性研究。

Clinical and autopsy diagnoses in the intensive care unit: a prospective study.

作者信息

Combes Alain, Mokhtari Mourad, Couvelard Anne, Trouillet Jean-Louis, Baudot Jérôme, Hénin Dominique, Gibert Claude, Chastre Jean

机构信息

Services de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Bichat, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2004 Feb 23;164(4):389-92. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.4.389.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Autopsy rates have declined worldwide, but recent retrospective intensive care unit (ICU) data indicate major discrepancies between more than 25% of clinical and autopsy diagnoses.

METHODS

We conducted a 3-year prospective study of all consecutive autopsies performed on patients who died in a university hospital medical-surgical ICU to determine how many might have benefited from a different level of care, had the autopsy diagnosis been made before death. All clinical diagnoses were compared with autopsy findings at monthly clinical-pathological meetings. Major and minor diagnostic discrepancies were categorized according to the criteria of Goldman et al.

RESULTS

Of 1492 patients admitted to the ICU, 315 died, of whom 167 (53.0%) were autopsied. The most common reason (79.7%) for not obtaining an autopsy was family refusal. The mean +/- SD clinical characteristics were similar for autopsied vs nonautopsied patients, except for shorter length of ICU stay (13 +/- 17 vs 20 +/- 27 days, P =.006), shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (13 +/- 16 vs 19 +/- 25 days, P =.01), and lower percentage of postcardiac surgery patients (38.9% vs 50.0%, P =.05). Among the intensivists' 694 clinical diagnoses, 33 (4.8%) were refuted and 13 (1.9%) were judged incomplete by autopsy findings. Autopsies revealed 171 missed diagnoses, including 21 cancers, 12 strokes, 11 myocardial infarctions, 10 pulmonary emboli, and 9 endocarditis, among others. Major diagnostic errors (class I and class II discrepancies) were made in 53 (31.7%) of 167 patients, with a high percentage of immunocompromised patients also observed among these. Similar percentages of patients with class I and class II errors vs other patients had undergone modern diagnostic techniques during their ICU stay.

CONCLUSION

Even in the era of modern diagnostic technology, regular comparisons of clinical and autopsy diagnoses provide pertinent information that might improve future management of ICU patients.

摘要

背景

全球尸检率呈下降趋势,但近期重症监护病房(ICU)的回顾性数据表明,超过25%的临床诊断与尸检诊断之间存在重大差异。

方法

我们对一所大学医院内科-外科ICU死亡患者进行的所有连续尸检进行了为期3年的前瞻性研究,以确定如果在死亡前做出尸检诊断,有多少患者可能会从不同级别的护理中受益。在每月的临床病理会议上,将所有临床诊断与尸检结果进行比较。主要和次要诊断差异根据戈德曼等人的标准进行分类。

结果

在1492名入住ICU的患者中,315人死亡,其中167人(53.0%)接受了尸检。未进行尸检的最常见原因(79.7%)是家属拒绝。除了ICU住院时间较短(13±17天对20±27天,P = 0.006)、机械通气时间较短(13±16天对19±25天,P = 0.01)以及心脏手术后患者比例较低(38.9%对50.0%,P = 0.05)外,接受尸检与未接受尸检患者的平均±标准差临床特征相似。在内科重症医生的694例临床诊断中,33例(4.8%)被尸检结果推翻,13例(1.9%)被判定不完整。尸检发现171例漏诊,包括21例癌症、12例中风、11例心肌梗死、10例肺栓塞和9例心内膜炎等。167例患者中有53例(31.7%)出现主要诊断错误(I类和II类差异),其中免疫功能低下患者的比例也较高。I类和II类错误患者与其他患者中,在ICU住院期间接受现代诊断技术检查的比例相似。

结论

即使在现代诊断技术时代,定期比较临床诊断和尸检诊断也能提供相关信息,可能改善未来ICU患者的管理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验