Leibl B J, Jäger C, Kraft B, Kraft K, Schwarz J, Ulrich M, Bittner R
Department for General and Visceral Surgery, Marien Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005 Apr;390(2):77-82. doi: 10.1007/s00423-004-0532-5. Epub 2005 Feb 15.
Of various endoscopic hernia repair procedures, TAPP and TEP have been selected for routine use.
Results from Medline research were analysed.
There is a similar risk for postoperative morbidity for both techniques. The recurrence rate in large single-centre series is between 0% and 3.4%. There were numerous indications for both procedures, whereby a transperitoneal TAPP can also be applied in cases of previous preperitoneal operations.
Randomised trials comparing both methods of hernia repair are lacking. Seven non-randomised studies showed no differences in recurrence rate and morbidity. In general the learning curve for is shorter in favour of TAPP repair.
在各种内镜下疝修补手术中,经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)和全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)已被选定用于常规手术。
对医学文献数据库(Medline)检索结果进行分析。
两种技术术后发病风险相似。大型单中心系列研究中的复发率在0%至3.4%之间。两种手术都有众多适应证,经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)也可用于既往有腹膜前手术史的病例。
缺乏比较这两种疝修补方法的随机试验。七项非随机研究表明复发率和发病率无差异。总体而言,经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)的学习曲线较短。