• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

观察性研究与实验性研究:等级制度的证据是什么?

Observational versus experimental studies: what's the evidence for a hierarchy?

作者信息

Concato John

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA.

出版信息

NeuroRx. 2004 Jul;1(3):341-7. doi: 10.1602/neurorx.1.3.341.

DOI:10.1602/neurorx.1.3.341
PMID:15717036
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC534936/
Abstract

The tenets of evidence-based medicine include an emphasis on hierarchies of research design (i.e., study architecture). Often, a single randomized, controlled trial is considered to provide "truth," whereas results from any observational study are viewed with suspicion. This paper describes information that contradicts and discourages such a rigid approach to evaluating the quality of research design. Unless a more balanced strategy evolves, new claims of methodological authority may be just as problematic as the traditional claims of medical authority that have been criticized by proponents of evidence-based medicine.

摘要

循证医学的原则包括强调研究设计的层次结构(即研究架构)。通常,单个随机对照试验被认为能提供“真相”,而任何观察性研究的结果都受到质疑。本文描述了与这种评估研究设计质量的僵化方法相矛盾并令人气馁的信息。除非形成一种更平衡的策略,否则新的方法学权威主张可能会与循证医学支持者所批评的传统医学权威主张一样存在问题。

相似文献

1
Observational versus experimental studies: what's the evidence for a hierarchy?观察性研究与实验性研究:等级制度的证据是什么?
NeuroRx. 2004 Jul;1(3):341-7. doi: 10.1602/neurorx.1.3.341.
2
[Don't throw out the observation studies with the bath-water. Assess their quality instead].不要因噎废食地摒弃观察性研究。相反,应评估它们的质量。
Lakartidningen. 2008;105(45):3191-4.
3
Hierarchy of evidence: where observational studies fit in and why we need them.证据等级:观察性研究的地位及其必要性
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 May;91 Suppl 3:2-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01571.
4
Hierarchy of evidence: from case reports to randomized controlled trials.证据等级:从病例报告到随机对照试验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Aug(413):19-24. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000079323.41006.12.
5
Evidence-based medicine must be ..循证医学必须是.. (你提供的原文不完整,翻译可能不太准确)
J Med Philos. 2009 Oct;34(5):509-27. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhp034. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
6
What's in a gold standard? In defence of randomised controlled trials.金标准是什么?为随机对照试验辩护。
Med Health Care Philos. 2017 Dec;20(4):513-523. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9773-2.
7
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 4: observational studies.基于证据的医学、系统评价以及介入性疼痛管理指南:第4部分:观察性研究
Pain Physician. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):73-108.
8
Evidence-based dentistry: Part IV. Research design and levels of evidence.循证牙科:第四部分。研究设计与证据级别。
J Can Dent Assoc. 2001 Jul-Aug;67(7):375-8.
9
Study design and "evidence" in patient-oriented research.面向患者的研究中的设计与“证据”。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jun 1;187(11):1167-72. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201303-0521OE.
10
Methods in epidemiology: observational study designs.流行病学方法:观察性研究设计。
Pharmacotherapy. 2010 Oct;30(10):973-84. doi: 10.1592/phco.30.10.973.

引用本文的文献

1
The fundamentals of eye tracking part 1: The link between theory and research question.眼动追踪基础 第1部分:理论与研究问题之间的联系
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 12;57(1):16. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02544-8.
2
Awake prone positioning for non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxic respiratory failure: a systematic review based on eight high-quality randomized controlled trials.清醒俯卧位通气用于 COVID-19 相关急性低氧性呼吸衰竭未插管患者:基于 8 项高质量随机对照试验的系统评价。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Jun 19;23(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08393-8.
3
Knowledge of Medical Imaging Professionals on Healthcare-Associated Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.医学影像学专业人员对医源性感染的认知:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;20(5):4326. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054326.
4
Pharmacogenomics: current status and future perspectives.药物基因组学:现状与未来展望。
Nat Rev Genet. 2023 Jun;24(6):350-362. doi: 10.1038/s41576-022-00572-8. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
5
Observational evidence in support of screening for depression during pregnancy and the postpartum period.支持在孕期和产后筛查抑郁症的观察性证据。
CMAJ. 2022 Nov 7;194(43):E1487. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.147193-l.
6
Defining the Effect of Oxytocin Use in Farrowing Sows on Stillbirth Rate: A Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis.确定分娩母猪使用缩宫素对死产率的影响:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jul 13;12(14):1795. doi: 10.3390/ani12141795.
7
Safety of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) treatment among children and young adults who suffer from adverse effects of conventional cancer treatment: A systematic review.补充和替代医学(CAM)治疗在儿童和青年癌症常规治疗不良反应患者中的安全性:系统评价。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2022 Jan-Dec;21:15347354221105563. doi: 10.1177/15347354221105563.
8
Religiosity and the Spread of COVID-19: A Multinational Comparison.宗教信仰与 COVID-19 的传播:一项跨国比较。
J Relig Health. 2022 Apr;61(2):1641-1656. doi: 10.1007/s10943-022-01521-9. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
9
SensorHub: Multimodal Sensing in Real-Life Enables Home-Based Studies.传感器中心:现实生活中的多模式感知使基于家庭的研究成为可能。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 5;22(1):408. doi: 10.3390/s22010408.
10
Differences in Baseline Characteristics and Access to Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Patients With IPF in the EMPIRE Countries.EMPIRE国家中初诊特发性肺纤维化患者的基线特征及治疗可及性差异。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 23;8:729203. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.729203. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Hormone replacement therapy and acute coronary outcomes: methodological issues between randomized and observational studies.
Hum Reprod. 2004 Jan;19(1):8-13. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh022.
2
Understanding the divergent data on postmenopausal hormone therapy.理解绝经后激素治疗中存在分歧的数据。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 13;348(7):645-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb022365.
3
The mammography dilemma: a crisis for evidence-based medicine?
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Sep 3;137(5 Part 1):363-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-5_part_1-200209030-00015.
4
Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial.健康绝经后妇女使用雌激素加孕激素的风险与益处:妇女健康倡议随机对照试验的主要结果
JAMA. 2002 Jul 17;288(3):321-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.3.321.
5
Integrating clinical trial data into clinical practice.
Neurology. 2002 Jun 25;58(12 Suppl 7):S6-12. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.12_suppl_7.s6.
6
A prospective, observational study of postmenopausal hormone therapy and primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.一项关于绝经后激素治疗与心血管疾病一级预防的前瞻性观察性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Dec 19;133(12):933-41. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-12-200012190-00008.
7
Randomized trials or observational tribulations?随机试验还是观察性试验?
N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 22;342(25):1907-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200006223422511.
8
Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs.随机对照试验、观察性研究以及研究设计的层次结构。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 22;342(25):1887-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200006223422507.
9
A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials.观察性研究与随机对照试验的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 22;342(25):1878-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200006223422506.
10
E5 murine monoclonal antiendotoxin antibody in gram-negative sepsis: a randomized controlled trial. E5 Study Investigators.E5鼠单克隆抗内毒素抗体治疗革兰阴性菌败血症:一项随机对照试验。E5研究调查人员。
JAMA. 2000 Apr 5;283(13):1723-30. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.13.1723.