Suppr超能文献

吗氯贝胺与氯米帕明治疗抑郁症的对比:西班牙多中心试验

Moclobemide versus clomipramine in the treatment of depression: a multicentre trial in Spain.

作者信息

Civeira J, Cervera S, Giner J, Allen S R, Hellstern K, Malanowski H, Wirz R, Klar K

机构信息

San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1990;360:48-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb05327.x.

Abstract

The efficacy, tolerability and safety of moclobemide were compared with those of clomipramine in a double-blind, randomized parallel group study over 4 weeks. Patients were suffering from various forms of depression: 33 received moclobemide and 31 clomipramine. The mean score on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression decreased gradually in both groups, with no significant differences between them; the final scores showed an improvement of 57% in the moclobemide group and 60% in the clomipramine group, compared with baseline. The investigators' assessment of efficacy at the end of treatment was good or very good for 60% of moclobemide patients and 50% of clomipramine patients, and tolerance was good or very good for 31 patients on moclobemide and 26 on clomipramine. The drugs thus showed comparable antidepressant efficacy, and both were mostly well tolerated, although adverse events were more prevalent in patients treated with clomipramine.

摘要

在一项为期4周的双盲、随机平行组研究中,比较了吗氯贝胺与氯米帕明的疗效、耐受性和安全性。患者患有各种形式的抑郁症:33例接受吗氯贝胺治疗,31例接受氯米帕明治疗。两组患者的汉密尔顿抑郁量表平均评分均逐渐下降,两组间无显著差异;与基线相比,吗氯贝胺组的最终评分改善了57%,氯米帕明组改善了60%。治疗结束时,研究者对60%的吗氯贝胺患者和50%的氯米帕明患者的疗效评估为良好或非常好,31例服用吗氯贝胺的患者和26例服用氯米帕明的患者耐受性良好或非常好。因此,两种药物显示出相当的抗抑郁疗效,并且大多耐受性良好,尽管氯米帕明治疗的患者中不良事件更为普遍。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验