Civeira J, Cervera S, Giner J, Allen S R, Hellstern K, Malanowski H, Wirz R, Klar K
San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1990;360:48-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb05327.x.
The efficacy, tolerability and safety of moclobemide were compared with those of clomipramine in a double-blind, randomized parallel group study over 4 weeks. Patients were suffering from various forms of depression: 33 received moclobemide and 31 clomipramine. The mean score on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression decreased gradually in both groups, with no significant differences between them; the final scores showed an improvement of 57% in the moclobemide group and 60% in the clomipramine group, compared with baseline. The investigators' assessment of efficacy at the end of treatment was good or very good for 60% of moclobemide patients and 50% of clomipramine patients, and tolerance was good or very good for 31 patients on moclobemide and 26 on clomipramine. The drugs thus showed comparable antidepressant efficacy, and both were mostly well tolerated, although adverse events were more prevalent in patients treated with clomipramine.
在一项为期4周的双盲、随机平行组研究中,比较了吗氯贝胺与氯米帕明的疗效、耐受性和安全性。患者患有各种形式的抑郁症:33例接受吗氯贝胺治疗,31例接受氯米帕明治疗。两组患者的汉密尔顿抑郁量表平均评分均逐渐下降,两组间无显著差异;与基线相比,吗氯贝胺组的最终评分改善了57%,氯米帕明组改善了60%。治疗结束时,研究者对60%的吗氯贝胺患者和50%的氯米帕明患者的疗效评估为良好或非常好,31例服用吗氯贝胺的患者和26例服用氯米帕明的患者耐受性良好或非常好。因此,两种药物显示出相当的抗抑郁疗效,并且大多耐受性良好,尽管氯米帕明治疗的患者中不良事件更为普遍。