Suppr超能文献

社区精神卫生团队的联合协作:综合护理路径的实施

Joint working in community mental health teams: implementation of an integrated care pathway.

作者信息

Rees Gwyneth, Huby Guro, McDade Lian, McKechnie L

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Disability Studies, School of Health Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2004 Nov;12(6):527-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2004.00523.x.

Abstract

Abstract Integration of community mental health services is a key policy objective that aims to increase quality and efficiency of care. Integrated care pathways (ICPs) are a mechanism designed to formalise multi-agency working at an operational level and are currently being applied to mental health services. Evidence regarding the impact of this tool to support joint working is mixed, and there is limited evidence regarding the suitability of ICPs for complex, community-based services. The present study was set in one primary care trust (PCT) in Scotland that is currently implementing an ICP for community mental health teams (CMHTs) across the region. The aim of the study was to investigate professionals' experiences and views on the implementation of an ICP within adult CMHTs in order to generate learning points for other organisations which are considering developing and implementing such systems. The study used qualitative methods which comprised of individual interviews with three CMHT leaders and two service development managers, as well as group interviews with members of four adult CMHTs. Data was analysed using the constant comparison method. Participants reported positive views regarding joint working and the role of an ICP in theory. However, in practice, teams were not implementing the ICP. Lack of integration at higher organisational levels was found to create conflicts within the teams which became explicit in response to the ICP. Implementation was also hindered by lack of resources for ongoing support, team development and change management. In conclusion, the study suggests that operational systems such as ICPs do not address and cannot overcome wider organisational barriers to integration of mental health services. Integrated care pathways need to be developed with strategic input as well as practitioner involvement and ownership. Team development, education about integration and change management are essential if ICPs are to foster and support joint working in integrated teams.

摘要

摘要 社区精神卫生服务整合是一项关键政策目标,旨在提高护理质量和效率。整合照护路径(ICPs)是一种旨在使多机构在运营层面的合作规范化的机制,目前正应用于精神卫生服务。关于该工具对支持联合工作的影响的证据参差不齐,且关于整合照护路径适用于复杂的社区服务的证据有限。本研究以苏格兰的一个初级保健信托基金(PCT)为背景,该信托基金目前正在为该地区的社区精神卫生团队(CMHTs)实施整合照护路径。该研究的目的是调查专业人员对在成人社区精神卫生团队中实施整合照护路径的经验和看法,以便为其他考虑开发和实施此类系统的组织提供经验教训。该研究采用定性方法,包括对三位社区精神卫生团队负责人和两位服务发展经理进行个人访谈,以及对四个成人社区精神卫生团队的成员进行小组访谈。使用持续比较法对数据进行分析。参与者在理论上对联合工作以及整合照护路径的作用持积极看法。然而,在实践中,各团队并未实施整合照护路径。研究发现,较高组织层面缺乏整合会在团队内部引发冲突,这些冲突在应对整合照护路径时变得明显。持续支持、团队发展和变革管理方面缺乏资源也阻碍了实施。总之,该研究表明,诸如整合照护路径之类的运营系统无法解决且无法克服精神卫生服务整合方面更广泛的组织障碍。整合照护路径需要在战略投入以及从业者的参与和主导下进行开发。如果整合照护路径要促进和支持整合团队中的联合工作,团队发展、整合教育和变革管理至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验