Good research conduct.
作者信息
Grigg J
机构信息
Division of Child Health, Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Leicester, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK.
出版信息
Arch Dis Child. 2005 Mar;90(3):229-32. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.032672.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Good research conduct.良好的研究行为。
Arch Dis Child. 2005 Mar;90(3):229-32. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.032672.
2
Promoting ethical conduct in the publication of research.促进研究成果发表中的道德行为。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2008 Summer;26(2):89-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3466.2008.00045.x.
3
Ethical dilemmas in journal publication.期刊发表中的伦理困境。
Clin Dermatol. 2012 Mar-Apr;30(2):231-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2011.06.013.
4
Research ethics III: Publication practices and authorship, conflicts of interest, and research misconduct.研究伦理 III：出版实践与作者署名、利益冲突和研究不端行为。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Feb;54(1):S346-62. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0263). Epub 2010 Nov 16.
5
The gray zone: scientific misconduct comes in many shades.
DNA Cell Biol. 2008 Feb;27(2):63-4. doi: 10.1089/dna.2008.1501.
6
Ethics in publication.出版伦理。
Endoscopy. 2015 Jul;47(7):575-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392435. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
7
[Ethical considerations in the publication of scientific articles].[科学文章发表中的伦理考量]
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011 May;64(5):427-9. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2011.02.006. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
8
Ethical behaviour of authors in biomedical journalism.生物医学新闻领域作者的道德行为。
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 2002 Mar;35(2):81-5.
9
Singapore Statement: a global agreement on responsible research conduct.
Lancet. 2010 Oct 2;376(9747):1125-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61456-0. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
10
Misconduct in science: does family medicine have a problem?科学领域的不当行为：家庭医学存在问题吗？
Fam Med. 1990 Mar-Apr;22(2):137-42.
本文引用的文献
1
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data.儿童抑郁症中的选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂：已发表数据与未发表数据的系统评价
Lancet. 2004 Apr 24;363(9418):1341-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16043-1.
2
A statement by the editors of The Lancet.《柳叶刀》编辑的一份声明。
Lancet. 2004 Mar 6;363(9411):820-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15699-7.
3
Retraction of an interpretation.撤销一种解释。
Lancet. 2004 Mar 6;363(9411):750. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15715-2.
4
Biases in the interpretation and use of research results.研究结果解读与应用中的偏差。
Annu Rev Psychol. 1998;49:259-87. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.259.
5
Different patterns of duplicate publication: an analysis of articles used in systematic reviews.重复发表的不同模式：对系统评价中所使用文章的分析
JAMA. 2004 Feb 25;291(8):974-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.8.974.
6
Whistleblowing in academic medicine.学术医学领域的举报行为。
J Med Ethics. 2004 Feb;30(1):35-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.005553.
7
Fraud offers big rewards for relatively little risk.欺诈只需承担相对较小的风险就能带来巨大回报。
Nature. 2004 Jan 29;427(6973):393. doi: 10.1038/427393a.
8
Good clinical practice is now obligatory in academic clinical drug research in the European Union.在欧盟，良好临床实践如今在学术性临床药物研究中是强制性的。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2004 Feb;94(2):57-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2004.pto940201.x.
9
Blowing the whistle--safely.
BMJ. 2004 Jan 3;328(7430):s7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7430.s7.
10
Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review.制药行业赞助与研究结果及质量：系统评价
BMJ. 2003 May 31;326(7400):1167-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7400.1167.
Zotero 插件